Marshall Alison L
School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
J Phys Act Health. 2007 Jul;4(3):305-14. doi: 10.1123/jpah.4.3.305.
The aim of this study was to determine if feedback on step counts from a pedometer encourages participants to increase walking.
Randomly recruited older adults (n = 105) were asked to wear a pedometer for 2 wk. Half the participants were asked to monitor and record daily step counts during week 1 (feedback), then seal the pedometer shut during week 2 (no feedback). Half completed the study in reverse order. Self-reported walking was assessed via telephone interviews.
Significantly more steps were recorded per day (approximately 400 steps per day) when participants (n = 103, 63% women; mean BMI 25 +/- 4) monitored their daily step count [t(102) = -2.30, P = 0.02)] compared to the no feedback condition. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported walking (P = 0.31) between feedback conditions.
The difference in daily step counts observed between conditions, while statistically significant, may not be considered clinically significant. Further, the non-significant difference in self-reported walking between conditions suggests that feedback on daily step counts from a pedometer does not encourage participants to increase their walking.
本研究的目的是确定来自计步器的步数反馈是否会促使参与者增加步行量。
随机招募老年人(n = 105),要求他们佩戴计步器2周。一半参与者被要求在第1周监测并记录每日步数(反馈组),然后在第2周将计步器封好(无反馈组)。另一半则以相反顺序完成研究。通过电话访谈评估自我报告的步行情况。
与无反馈组相比,当参与者(n = 103,63%为女性;平均BMI 25±4)监测其每日步数时,每天记录的步数明显更多(约每天400步)[t(102) = -2.30,P = 0.02]。反馈组之间自我报告的步行情况在统计学上无显著差异(P = 0.31)。
不同条件下观察到的每日步数差异虽具有统计学意义,但可能不具有临床意义。此外,不同条件下自我报告的步行情况无显著差异表明,计步器提供的每日步数反馈不会促使参与者增加步行量。