Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚积极生活身体活动问卷对老年人有效吗?

Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation & School of Public Health, Victoria Park Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2011 May;14(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults.

DESIGN

The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness.

METHOD

Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65-89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study.

RESULTS

Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r=0.42, p=0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion (r=-0.11, p=0.44; r=-0.25, p=0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores (r=0.39, p=0.004), but walking minutes were not (r=0.15, p=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.

摘要

目的

澳大利亚活跃调查(AAS)用于监测普通澳大利亚成年人群的体力活动(PA),但尚未对老年人的有效性进行评估。我们的目的是研究 AAS 问题在老年人中的收敛效度。

设计

AAS 与计步器的步数进行了验证,作为 PA 的客观测量指标,自我报告的身体功能以及评估心肺功能的台阶测试。

方法

参与者为年龄在 65-89 岁之间、能够行走 100 米的社区居住成年人。他们在一次访谈中完成了自我管理的 AAS 和台阶测试。一周前,他们完成了简短形式-36 身体功能子量表。在这两次访谈之间,他们每人佩戴了一个 YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 计步器并记录了日常步数。使用 AAS 数据,与有效性测量指标相比,每日步行分钟数和总 PA 分钟数(步行,中强度 PA 和高强度 PA)使用 Spearman 秩相关进行比较。53 名成年人完成了研究。

结果

中位数每日步行分钟数为 34.2(四分位距[IQR] 17.1,60.0),中位数每日总 PA 分钟数为 68.6(IQR 31.4,113.6)。步行和总 PA 分钟数与计步器步数均呈中度相关(Spearman 相关 r=0.42,p=0.003,分别),但与台阶测试完成秒数无关(r=-0.11,p=0.44;r=-0.25,p=0.08,分别)。总 PA 分钟数与身体功能评分显着相关(r=0.39,p=0.004),但步行分钟数无关(r=0.15,p=0.29)。

结论

对老年人 AAS 心理测量特性的初步检查表明,该监测工具对活跃于社区的老年人具有可接受的收敛效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验