Suppr超能文献

老年护理环境量表的因子结构

Factor structure of the geriatric care environment scale.

作者信息

Kim Hongsoo, Capezuti Elizabeth, Boltz Marie, Fairchild Susan, Fulmer Terry, Mezey Mathy

机构信息

Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, New York University College of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):339-47. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289500.37661.aa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults comprise approximately 60% of all adult, nonobstetric hospital admissions. Nurses Improving Care for Health System Elders (NICHE) is a national program aimed at system improvement to achieve patient-centered care for older adults. The NICHE hospitals use the Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile (GIAP) to assess their institutional readiness to provide quality care to older adults and to document improvement in geriatric care delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factorial structure of the 28-item Geriatric Care Environment Scale (GCES) of the GIAP, test its validity with a sample of staff registered nurses (RNs), and evaluate its invariance across 4 groups of RNs who worked at 4 different types of hospitals.

METHODS

Staff RNs (N = 9,400) at 71 acute hospitals, who responded to the GIAP from 1999 to 2004, were split randomly into 2 groups for cross-validation. A 3-step data analysis was completed. The a priori factor structure was developed using exploratory factor analysis. The obtained factor model was validated, and its invariance by types of hospitals was examined by confirmatory factor analyses.

RESULTS

The GCES is internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = .93) and accounts for approximately 55% of the total variance. The 4 factors extracted from the exploratory factor analysis are Aging-Sensitive Care Delivery, Resource Availability, Institutional Values Regarding Older Adults and Staff, and Capacity for Collaboration. The 4-factor structured model is validated in a half-randomly selected sample (normed fit index [NFI] = .931, nonnormed fit index [NNFI] = .933, comparative fit index [CFI] = .939, root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .058) and does not vary significantly across the 4 groups of RNs who worked at the 4 different types of hospitals (NFI = .969, NNFI = .975, CFI = .976, RMSEA = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

The GCES is a reliable measure of RN perception of how care provided to older adults reflects age-sensitive principles and the organizational practice environment that supports or hinders care delivery.

摘要

背景

在所有非产科成人住院患者中,老年人约占60%。护士改善医疗系统老年患者护理(NICHE)是一项旨在改善医疗系统,为老年人提供以患者为中心护理的全国性项目。NICHE医院使用老年机构评估概况(GIAP)来评估其机构为老年人提供优质护理的准备情况,并记录老年护理服务的改善情况。

目的

探讨GIAP中28项老年护理环境量表(GCES)的因子结构,以注册护士(RN)样本检验其有效性,并评估其在4组在4种不同类型医院工作的RN中的不变性。

方法

将1999年至2004年对GIAP做出回应的71家急症医院的RN工作人员(N = 9400)随机分为2组进行交叉验证。完成了三步数据分析。使用探索性因子分析建立先验因子结构。对获得的因子模型进行验证,并通过验证性因子分析检查其在不同类型医院中的不变性。

结果

GCES内部一致性良好(Cronbach's alpha = 0.93),约占总方差的55%。从探索性因子分析中提取的4个因子分别是对老龄化敏感的护理服务、资源可用性、机构对老年人和工作人员的价值观以及协作能力。四因子结构模型在半随机选择的样本中得到验证(规范拟合指数[NFI] = 0.931,非规范拟合指数[NNFI] = 0.933,比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.939,近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.058),并且在4组在4种不同类型医院工作的RN中没有显著差异(NFI = 0.969,NNFI = 0.975,CFI = 0.976,RMSEA = 0.027)。

结论

GCES是一种可靠的测量工具,可用于衡量RN对为老年人提供的护理如何反映对年龄敏感原则以及支持或阻碍护理服务的组织实践环境的看法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验