Izatt Maree T, Thorpe Paul L P J, Thompson Robert G, D'Urso Paul S, Adam Clayton J, Earwaker John W S, Labrom Robert D, Askin Geoffrey N
Paediatric Spine Research Group, Level 2, Mater Children's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology and Mater Health Services Brisbane Ltd, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
Prior studies have suggested that biomodels enhance patient education, preoperative planning and intra-operative stereotaxy; however, the usefulness of biomodels compared to regular imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT and MR has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the surgeon's perceptions on the usefulness of biomodels compared to standard visualisation modalities for preoperative planning and intra-operative anatomical reference. Physical biomodels were manufactured for a series of 26 consecutive patients with complex spinal pathologies using a stereolithographic technique based on CT data. The biomodels were used preoperatively for surgical planning and customising implants, and intra-operatively for anatomical reference. Following surgery, a detailed biomodel utility survey was completed by the surgeons, and informal telephone interviews were conducted with patients. Using biomodels, 21 deformity and 5 tumour cases were performed. Surgeons stated that the anatomical details were better visible on the biomodel than on other imaging modalities in 65% of cases, and exclusively visible on the biomodel in 11% of cases. Preoperative use of the biomodel led to a different decision regarding the choice of osteosynthetic materials used in 52% of cases, and the implantation site of osteosynthetic material in 74% of cases. Surgeons reported that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 8% in tumour patients and 22% in deformity procedures. This study supports biomodelling as a useful, and sometimes essential tool in the armamentarium of imaging techniques used for complex spinal surgery.
先前的研究表明,生物模型可加强患者教育、术前规划和术中立体定位;然而,与X射线、CT和MR等常规成像方式相比,生物模型的有用性尚未得到量化。我们的目标是量化外科医生对于生物模型在术前规划和术中解剖参考方面相对于标准可视化方式的有用性的看法。基于CT数据,采用立体光刻技术为连续26例患有复杂脊柱疾病的患者制作了物理生物模型。这些生物模型在术前用于手术规划和定制植入物,在术中用于解剖参考。手术后,外科医生完成了一份详细的生物模型效用调查问卷,并对患者进行了非正式电话访谈。使用生物模型进行了21例畸形和5例肿瘤手术。外科医生表示,在65%的病例中,生物模型上的解剖细节比其他成像方式更清晰可见,在11%的病例中仅在生物模型上可见。在52%的病例中,术前使用生物模型导致在选择骨合成材料方面做出了不同的决定,在74%的病例中,导致了骨合成材料植入部位的不同决定。外科医生报告称,使用生物模型使肿瘤患者的手术时间平均减少了8%,在畸形手术中减少了22%。本研究支持将生物建模作为复杂脊柱手术成像技术手段中一种有用且有时必不可少的工具。