Akpinar Ersin, Bashan Ibrahim, Bozdemir Nafiz, Saatci Esra
Department of Family Medicine, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Coll Antropol. 2007 Jun;31(2):387-93.
This study was designed to define the most suitable anthropometric technique among body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) as indices of obesity in adult people living in Adana, a Southern province of Turkey. A random sample design was used. A total of 900 individuals (men and non-pregnant women aged 25-65 years) were enrolled in the study. Of subjects, 50.9% were females. Anthropometric measurements were performed. Data were analysed using statistical package program. The prevalence of obesity among adults living in Adana was 20.8% 28.4% when defined using BMI, 30.5% by WC and 15.8% 42.0% by WHR. Truncal obesity and gynoid obesity showed similar prevalence with 26.6%, in the same age group. Waist circumference, BMI and WHR identified different proportions of the population, as measured for obesity prevalence. The most common methods for diagnosing overweight and obesity are based on BMI (kg/m2). However, BMI is suboptimal marker for total body fat percentage and even less suitable to assess body fat distribution. WHR is the most useful measure of obesity and the best simple anthropometric index in predicting a wide range of risk factors and related health conditions.
本研究旨在确定体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)和腰臀比(WHR)这几种人体测量技术中,哪一种最适合作为土耳其南部省份阿达纳成年居民肥胖的指标。采用随机抽样设计。共有900人(年龄在25至65岁之间的男性和非孕女性)参与了该研究。其中,50.9%为女性。进行了人体测量。使用统计软件包程序对数据进行分析。以BMI定义时,阿达纳成年居民的肥胖患病率为20.8%;以WC定义时为28.4%;以WHR定义时为30.5%,其中15.8%至42.0%。在同一年龄组中,躯干型肥胖和臀型肥胖的患病率相似,均为26.6%。腰围、BMI和WHR所确定的肥胖患病率人群比例不同。诊断超重和肥胖最常用的方法是基于BMI(千克/平方米)。然而,BMI并非全身脂肪百分比的最佳指标,甚至更不适用于评估身体脂肪分布。WHR是预测一系列危险因素和相关健康状况时最有用的肥胖测量指标,也是最佳的简单人体测量指数。