Gupta Devendra K, Sharma Shilpa, Arora Mahesh K, Agarwal Gautam, Gupta Malvika, Grover Ved P
Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Sep;42(9):1471-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.001.
The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after esophageal replacement using gastric pull-up performed in critically ill neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula.
During 1998 to 2005, gastric transposition was performed in 27 neonates (mean birth weight, 2.32 kg [1.86-3.0 kg]; mean age, 6.08 days) for post-EA and tracheoesophageal fistula leaks in 17, long gap in 6, and pure EA in 4, using transhiatal route in all. Pyloromyotomy as the drainage procedure was added for all 27 neonates. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical evaluation, gastric clearance, duodenogastric reflux, and gastric pressure profile.
Six neonates had ongoing serious chest infection, 3 had lung collapse, and 2 had associated congenital heart disease. Postoperative elective ventilation was provided to all neonates for 2 to 40 days (mean, 10.6 days). Nine neonates developed postoperative leaks in the neck; all healed spontaneously before discharge. Mean hospital stay was 32.6 days (range, 9-87 days). Four newborns died on postoperative days 9, 13, 15, and 29 because of existing severe sepsis in 3 and major congenital heart disease in 1. Functional evaluations were done at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Values at 6 months revealed normal gastric emptying in 16 of 23, presence of duodenal gastric reflux in 11 of 23, and mass contractions with significant rise in intragastric pressure after bolus feeds in 16 of 23 cases. Values at 12 months revealed normal gastric emptying in 14 of 20, presence of duodenal gastric reflux in 8 of 20, and mass contractions with significant rise in intragastric pressure after bolus feeds in 13 (65%) of 20 cases.
Gastric transposition could be a lifesaving alternative to diversion, even in the critically ill newborns after major leaks. However, it requires technical surgical expertise and an effective pain relief and neonatal intensive care.
本研究旨在评估在患有食管闭锁(EA)和气管食管瘘的危重新生儿中采用胃上提术进行食管置换后的结局。
1998年至2005年期间,对27例新生儿(平均出生体重2.32 kg[1.86 - 3.0 kg];平均年龄6.08天)进行了胃移位术,其中17例用于治疗EA和气管食管瘘后的漏出,6例用于治疗长节段缺损,4例用于治疗单纯EA,均采用经裂孔途径。所有27例新生儿均加做幽门肌切开术作为引流措施。在3个月、6个月和12个月时对患者进行随访,以进行临床评估、胃排空、十二指肠胃反流和胃压力曲线检查。
6例新生儿持续存在严重的胸部感染,3例发生肺不张,2例合并先天性心脏病。所有新生儿术后均接受了2至40天(平均10.6天)的选择性通气。9例新生儿术后颈部出现漏出;均在出院前自行愈合。平均住院时间为32.6天(范围9 - 87天)。4例新生儿分别在术后第9天、13天、15天和29天死亡,其中3例死于严重脓毒症,1例死于重大先天性心脏病。术后3个月、6个月和12个月进行了功能评估。6个月时的评估结果显示,23例中有16例胃排空正常,23例中有11例存在十二指肠胃反流,23例中有16例在推注喂养后出现胃内压显著升高的集团蠕动。12个月时的评估结果显示,20例中有14例胃排空正常,20例中有8例存在十二指肠胃反流,20例中有13例(65%)在推注喂养后出现胃内压显著升高的集团蠕动。
即使对于发生重大漏出后的危重新生儿,胃移位术也可能是一种挽救生命的替代分流术的方法。然而,这需要专业的手术技术以及有效的疼痛缓解措施和新生儿重症监护。