Vilahur Gemma, Casaní Laura, Badimon Lina
Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Thromb Haemost. 2007 Sep;98(3):662-9.
Acute thrombosis is a threat in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Our objective was to determine if stent-induced thrombus formation could be inhibited by oral treatment with a thromboxane A(2)/prostaglandin H(2) receptor antagonist (TPr; S18886) as an alternative to standard therapy. Pigs were allocated in the following treatment (p.o) groups: I) clopidogrel (CLOP); II) ASA; III) S18886; IV) ASA+CLOP; and V) placebo-control. Damaged vessel was placed in the Badimon chamber containing a stent and perfused at 212/s. Antithrombotic effects were assessed as (111)In-platelet deposition (PD) in two series (60 and 180 min after drug intake). Fibrin(ogen) deposition, light transmittance aggregometry (LTA; collagen, U46619, and ADP), and bleeding time (BT) were also evaluated. After 60 min S18886 reduced PD < or =48%, 40%, and 35% vs placebo, CLOP-, and ASA-treated animals, respectively (P < 0.05), while ASA+CLOP showed a 58% reduction versus placebo (P < 0.01). After 3 hours, ASA+CLOP decreased PD by 55%, S18886 by 40%, CLOP alone by 28% (P < 0.05), and ASA showed no inhibition versus placebo. Similar effects were found in S18886- and ASA+CLOP-treated animals at both times. Fibrin(ogen) deposition followed the same pattern. Collagen-induced LTA was significantly reduced by ASA, ASA+CLOP, and S18886; S18886 abolished U46619-induced LTA; and, CLOP +/- ASA reduced ADP-induced LTA in a time-dependent manner. TPr blockade did not prolong BT, whereas CLOP +/- ASA significantly did (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, blockade of the TPr provided a fast and potent platelet inhibitory effect in a porcine model of in-stent thrombosis comparable to that of blocking both the ADP receptor and cyclooxygenase activation; in addition, TPr provided a more favorable bleeding risk profile.
急性血栓形成对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并植入支架的患者构成威胁。我们的目标是确定口服血栓素A(2)/前列腺素H(2)受体拮抗剂(TPr;S18886)作为标准治疗的替代方法是否能抑制支架诱导的血栓形成。将猪分配到以下口服治疗组:I)氯吡格雷(CLOP);II)阿司匹林(ASA);III)S18886;IV)ASA + CLOP;V)安慰剂对照。将受损血管置于装有支架的Badimon腔室中,并以212/s的速度灌注。在两个时间段(服药后60分钟和180分钟)评估抗血栓作用,以(111)铟标记的血小板沉积(PD)作为指标。还评估了纤维蛋白(原)沉积、透光率聚集测定法(LTA;胶原、U46619和二磷酸腺苷(ADP))以及出血时间(BT)。60分钟后,与安慰剂、CLOP治疗组和ASA治疗组相比,S18886分别使PD降低≤48%、40%和35%(P < 0.05),而ASA + CLOP与安慰剂相比使PD降低58%(P < 0.01)。3小时后,ASA + CLOP使PD降低55%,S18886降低40%,单独使用CLOP降低28%(P < 0.05),而ASA与安慰剂相比无抑制作用。在两个时间点,S18886和ASA + CLOP治疗组均发现类似效果。纤维蛋白(原)沉积呈现相同模式。胶原诱导的LTA被ASA、ASA + CLOP和S18886显著降低;S18886消除了U46619诱导的LTA;CLOP ± ASA以时间依赖性方式降低ADP诱导的LTA。TPr阻断未延长BT,而CLOP ± ASA显著延长了BT(P < 0.0001)。总之,在支架内血栓形成的猪模型中,TPr阻断提供了快速且有效的血小板抑制作用,与阻断ADP受体和环氧合酶激活相当;此外,TPr具有更有利的出血风险特征。