Robacker David C, Thomas Donald B
Crop Quality and Fruit Insects Research, USDA-ARS, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2007 Aug;100(4):1147-52. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1147:cotsfl]2.0.co;2.
Feral Mexican fruit flies, Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae), were trapped in a citrus orchard in Mexico by using two types of synthetic food-odor lures, the AFF lure (Anastrepha fruit fly lure, APTIV, Inc., Portland, OR) and the BioLure (two-component MFF lure, Suterra LLC, Inc., Bend, OR). In Multilure traps (Better World Manufacturing, Inc., Miami, FL) containing water, BioLures captured about the same numbers of flies as AFF lures. In Multilure traps containing antifreeze solution, BioLures captured 2 and 5 times more flies than AFF lures in two experiments. BioLures, and AFF lures did not differ in attractiveness when used on sticky traps (Intercept trap, APTIV, Inc.; and sticky cylinder trap). Multilure traps captured >4 times as many flies as sticky traps with the exception that captures of females did not differ between Multilure and sticky traps baited with AFF lures. The percentage of females captured in Multilure traps was greater when traps were baited with BioLures compared with AFF lures, but the reverse was true for sticky traps. Sticky cylinder traps captured a higher percentage of females than Multilure traps. The most effective trap/lure combination was the Multilure trap baited with BioLure and antifreeze. In comparison with tests of these two lures in Texas, results were similar for Multilure traps, but they differed for sticky cylinder traps in that AFF lures were consistently more attractive than BioLures in Texas, but not in Mexico.
在墨西哥的一个柑橘园中，通过使用两种合成食物气味诱捕剂——AFF诱捕剂（Anastrepha果蝇诱捕剂，APTIV公司，俄勒冈州波特兰）和BioLure诱捕剂（双组分墨西哥果蝇诱捕剂，Suterra有限责任公司，俄勒冈州本德），捕获了野生墨西哥果蝇，即拉美实蝇（Loew）（双翅目：实蝇科）。在装有水的Multilure诱捕器（美好世界制造公司，佛罗里达州迈阿密）中，BioLure诱捕剂捕获的果蝇数量与AFF诱捕剂大致相同。在装有防冻液溶液的Multilure诱捕器中，在两项实验中，BioLure诱捕剂捕获的果蝇数量分别比AFF诱捕剂多2倍和5倍。当用于粘性诱捕器（拦截诱捕器，APTIV公司；以及粘性圆筒诱捕器）时，BioLure诱捕剂和AFF诱捕剂在吸引力上没有差异。Multilure诱捕器捕获的果蝇数量是粘性诱捕器的4倍多，但用AFF诱捕剂诱饵的Multilure诱捕器和粘性诱捕器捕获的雌蝇数量没有差异。与用AFF诱捕剂诱饵相比，用BioLure诱捕剂诱饵时，Multilure诱捕器中捕获的雌蝇百分比更高，但粘性诱捕器的情况则相反。粘性圆筒诱捕器捕获的雌蝇百分比高于Multilure诱捕器。最有效的诱捕器/诱捕剂组合是用BioLure诱捕剂和防冻液诱饵的Multilure诱捕器。与在得克萨斯州对这两种诱捕剂的测试相比，Multilure诱捕器的结果相似，但粘性圆筒诱捕器的结果不同，因为在得克萨斯州，AFF诱捕剂始终比BioLure诱捕剂更具吸引力，但在墨西哥并非如此。
