Suppr超能文献

一项关于事件相关电位(ERP)与自定步速阅读方法的并发研究。

An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies.

作者信息

Ditman Tali, Holcomb Phillip J, Kuperberg Gina R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00593.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

Abstract

Traditionally, event-related brain potential (ERP) studies of language processing have presented words at a fixed rate using rapid serial visual presentation. Recent studies suggest, however, that the processes engaged during sentence comprehension are contingent on word presentation rate. These findings underscore the importance of allowing participants to read at a natural pace. The present study employed simultaneous self-paced reading and ERP methodologies to examine behavioral and neural responses while participants read sentences containing pragmatic or morphosyntactic violations or no violations. ERP and self-paced reading results replicated previous findings. This novel combination of behavioral and ERP methodologies combines the high temporal resolution and direct neural measures offered by ERPs with the more natural reading environment and information about processing load provided by self-paced reading.

摘要

传统上,语言加工的事件相关脑电位(ERP)研究使用快速序列视觉呈现以固定速率呈现单词。然而,最近的研究表明,句子理解过程中涉及的加工过程取决于单词呈现速率。这些发现强调了让参与者以自然速度阅读的重要性。本研究采用同步自定步速阅读和ERP方法,在参与者阅读包含语用或形态句法违反或无违反情况的句子时,检查行为和神经反应。ERP和自定步速阅读结果重复了先前的发现。这种行为和ERP方法的新颖结合,将ERP提供的高时间分辨率和直接神经测量与自定步速阅读提供的更自然阅读环境和加工负荷信息结合起来。

相似文献

1
An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies.
Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00593.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
2
3
Semantic constraint, reading control, and the granularity of form-based expectations during semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 3;137:107294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107294. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
4
Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers.
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):523-531. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01082.x. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
5
Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 May;29(5):837-854. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01090. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;15(2):272-93. doi: 10.1162/089892903321208204.
7
Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first.
Psychophysiology. 2008 Nov;45(6):920-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00691.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
9
Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1355-70. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20093.
10
The Importance of Reading Naturally: Evidence From Combined Recordings of Eye Movements and Electric Brain Potentials.
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6:1232-1263. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12384. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction in reading: A review of predictability effects, their theoretical implications, and beyond.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):973-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Linguistic inputs must be syntactically parsable to fully engage the language network.
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 21:2024.06.21.599332. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.21.599332.
3
A mapping-knowledge-domain analysis of ERP research on language processing.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 12;18:1352753. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1352753. eCollection 2024.
4
7
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
8
Individual Differences in Political Ideology and Disgust Sensitivity Affect Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 11;12:699071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699071. eCollection 2021.
9
Retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) in expectation-based comprehension.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 28;16(9):e0257430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257430. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):801-15. doi: 10.3758/bf03193316.
2
Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.
Brain Res. 2006 Nov 6;1118(1):155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.022. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
3
Processing new and repeated names: effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP.
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:172-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.033. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
4
Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jun;16(5):715-26. doi: 10.1162/089892904970744.
6
Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):117-29. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7.
7
Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations.
Brain Lang. 2003 May;85(2):280-96. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00055-5.
8
Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Dec 1;4(12):463-470. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01560-6.
9
Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.
Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):126-37. doi: 10.1017/s004857729997155x.
10
Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.
Vision Res. 1997 Jul;37(14):1999-2010. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00017-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验