Shih Ya-Chen Tina, Konrad Thomas R
Section of Health Services Research, Department of Biostatistics, Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1895-925. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00690.x.
Physician income is generally high, but quite variable; hence, physicians have divergent perspectives regarding health policy initiatives and market reforms that could affect their incomes. We investigated factors underlying the distribution of income within the physician population.
Full-time physicians (N=10,777) from the restricted version of the 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey (CTS-PS), 1996 Area Resource File, and 1996 health maintenance organization penetration data.
We conducted separate analyses for primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. We employed least square and quantile regression models to examine factors associated with physician incomes at the mean and at various points of the income distribution, respectively. We accounted for the complex survey design for the CTS-PS data using appropriate weighted procedures and explored endogeneity using an instrumental variables method.
We detected widespread and subtle effects of many variables on physician incomes at different points (10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles) in the distribution that were undetected when employing regression estimations focusing on only the means or medians. Our findings show that the effects of managed care penetration are demonstrable at the mean of specialist incomes, but are more pronounced at higher levels. Conversely, a gender gap in earnings occurs at all levels of income of both PCPs and specialists, but is more pronounced at lower income levels.
The quantile regression technique offers an analytical tool to evaluate policy effects beyond the means. A longitudinal application of this approach may enable health policy makers to identify winners and losers among segments of the physician workforce and assess how market dynamics and health policy initiatives affect the overall physician income distribution over various time intervals.
医生收入总体较高,但差异很大;因此,医生对于可能影响其收入的卫生政策举措和市场改革有着不同的看法。我们调查了医生群体收入分布背后的因素。
来自1996 - 1997年社区追踪研究医生调查(CTS - PS)受限版、1996年区域资源文件以及1996年健康维护组织渗透率数据中的全职医生(N = 10777)。
我们分别对初级保健医生(PCP)和专科医生进行了分析。我们采用最小二乘法和分位数回归模型,分别研究与医生收入均值以及收入分布不同点相关的因素。我们使用适当的加权程序考虑了CTS - PS数据复杂的调查设计,并使用工具变量法探讨了内生性。
我们发现许多变量对收入分布不同点(第10、25、75和90百分位数)的医生收入有广泛而微妙的影响,而仅关注均值或中位数的回归估计未发现这些影响。我们的研究结果表明,管理式医疗渗透率对专科医生收入均值有显著影响,但在较高水平上更为明显。相反,初级保健医生和专科医生在所有收入水平上都存在收入性别差距,但在较低收入水平上更为明显。
分位数回归技术提供了一种超越均值来评估政策效果的分析工具。这种方法的纵向应用可能使卫生政策制定者能够识别医生劳动力群体中的赢家和输家,并评估市场动态和卫生政策举措如何在不同时间间隔内影响医生总体收入分布。