Suppr超能文献

可控释洗必泰芯片与阿莫西林/甲硝唑作为广泛侵袭性牙周炎辅助抗菌治疗的随机对照临床试验

Controlled-delivery chlorhexidine chip versus amoxicillin/metronidazole as adjunctive antimicrobial therapy for generalized aggressive periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Kaner Doğan, Bernimoulin Jean-Pierre, Hopfenmüller Werner, Kleber Bernd-Michael, Friedmann Anton

机构信息

Institute for Periodontology and Synoptic Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Oct;34(10):880-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01122.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subgingival application of chlorhexidine via a controlled-delivery device (CHX chip) improves the clinical outcome of scaling/root planing (SRP) in therapy for chronic periodontitis. Generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP) is commonly treated with SRP and adjunctive antimicrobial medication. To date, the efficacy of CHX chips in GAP therapy has not been evaluated.

AIM

To compare SRP plus adjunctive CHX chip placement with SRP plus adjunctive systemic amoxicillin/metronidazole with regard to clinical efficacy in first-line therapy for GAP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six GAP patients were treated with SRP and randomly with either placement of CHX chips or systemic amoxicillin/metronidazole. Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP) and suppuration (Pus) were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after therapy.

RESULTS

CAL, PD, BoP and Pus were significantly reduced in both groups after 3 months. In the CHX chip group, PD significantly increased again between 3 and 6 months. Finally, amoxicillin/metronidazole patients presented significantly more CAL "gain", PD reduction and less remaining deep sites after 6 months. Pus remained detectable in CHX chip patients only.

CONCLUSIONS

In first-line non-surgical therapy for GAP, SRP plus adjunctive systemic amoxicillin/metronidazole was more efficacious in clinically relevant measures of outcome than SRP plus adjunctive placement of CHX chips.

摘要

背景

通过控释装置(洗必泰芯片)进行龈下洗必泰应用可改善慢性牙周炎治疗中龈上洁治/根面平整(SRP)的临床效果。广泛侵袭性牙周炎(GAP)通常采用SRP和辅助抗菌药物治疗。迄今为止,洗必泰芯片在GAP治疗中的疗效尚未得到评估。

目的

比较SRP联合辅助放置洗必泰芯片与SRP联合辅助全身应用阿莫西林/甲硝唑在GAP一线治疗中的临床疗效。

材料与方法

36例GAP患者接受SRP治疗,并随机分为放置洗必泰芯片组或全身应用阿莫西林/甲硝唑组。在基线、治疗后3个月和6个月测量临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BoP)和化脓(Pus)情况。

结果

3个月后两组的CAL、PD、BoP和Pus均显著降低。在洗必泰芯片组中,3至6个月期间PD再次显著增加。最后,6个月后,阿莫西林/甲硝唑组患者的CAL“增加”、PD降低更为显著,剩余深牙周袋位点更少。仅在洗必泰芯片组患者中仍可检测到化脓情况。

结论

在GAP的一线非手术治疗中,SRP联合辅助全身应用阿莫西林/甲硝唑在临床相关疗效指标上比SRP联合辅助放置洗必泰芯片更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验