• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于龈下刮治和根面平整的袋内局部应用与注射麻醉剂的初步研究。

A preliminary study of intra-pocket topical versus injected anaesthetic for scaling and root planing.

作者信息

Stoltenberg Jill L, Osborn Joy B, Carlson Jeffrey F, Hodges James S, Michalowicz Bryan S

机构信息

Department of Primary Dental Care, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Oct;34(10):892-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01128.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01128.x
PMID:17850608
Abstract

AIM

Compare the efficacy of topical benzocaine gel to injected lidocaine during scaling and root planing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In each of 21 participants undergoing root planing, two dental quadrants were randomly assigned to receive topical 20% benzocaine gel delivered subgingivally (TOP) or injection anaesthesia using 2% lidocaine (INJ). Baseline, intra- and immediate post-operative pain was assessed using the Heft-Parker pain scale. Intra-subject differences (INJ-TOP) were analysed using paired t-tests and mixed models.

RESULTS

Baseline and post-operative pain did not differ between treatments (p>0.50). The injected anaesthetic, however, was associated with less intra-operative pain than the topical (INJ-TOP=-24.9 mm, p=0.005) Six participants required rescue (injected) anaesthesia during treatment with the topical. Eleven participants (52%) preferred topical over injected anaesthetic. Among these 11, intra-operative pain scores did not differ significantly (TOP=38.6 mm, INJ=28.4 mm, p=0.23). Among those who preferred the injected anaesthetic, intra-operative pain scores differed significantly (TOP=84.7 mm, INJ=43.8 mm, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-pocket benzocaine gel is less effective than injected lidocaine in controlling pain during scaling and planing. Anaesthetic preference was related to the level of pain experienced during treatment with the topical. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

比较在龈下刮治和根面平整过程中局部应用苯佐卡因凝胶与注射利多卡因的疗效。

材料与方法

21名接受根面平整的参与者,每个参与者的两个牙象限被随机分配,分别接受龈下局部应用20%苯佐卡因凝胶(TOP)或注射2%利多卡因进行麻醉(INJ)。使用赫夫特 - 帕克疼痛量表评估基线、术中及术后即刻疼痛。采用配对t检验和混合模型分析受试者内差异(INJ - TOP)。

结果

两种治疗方法的基线和术后疼痛无差异(p>0.50)。然而,注射麻醉剂在术中引起的疼痛比局部应用的少(INJ - TOP = -24.9 mm,p = 0.005)。6名参与者在局部应用治疗期间需要追加(注射)麻醉。11名参与者(52%)更喜欢局部应用而非注射麻醉剂。在这11名参与者中,术中疼痛评分无显著差异(TOP = 38.6 mm,INJ = 28.4 mm,p = 0.23)。在那些更喜欢注射麻醉剂的参与者中,术中疼痛评分有显著差异(TOP = 84.7 mm,INJ = 43.8 mm, p = 0.03)。

结论

在龈下刮治和根面平整过程中,袋内应用苯佐卡因凝胶在控制疼痛方面不如注射利多卡因有效。麻醉剂的偏好与局部应用治疗期间所经历的疼痛程度有关。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
A preliminary study of intra-pocket topical versus injected anaesthetic for scaling and root planing.用于龈下刮治和根面平整的袋内局部应用与注射麻醉剂的初步研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Oct;34(10):892-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01128.x.
2
Clinical evaluation and comparison of 2 topical anesthetics for pain caused by needle sticks and scaling and root planing.两种局部麻醉剂用于针刺及龈下刮治和根面平整所致疼痛的临床评估与比较
J Periodontol. 2001 Apr;72(4):479-84. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.479.
3
Effectiveness of a transmucosal lidocaine delivery system for local anaesthesia during scaling and root planing.一种经黏膜利多卡因给药系统在龈下刮治和根面平整术局部麻醉中的有效性。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):590-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00717.x.
4
Intrapocket anesthesia for scaling and root planing: results of a double-blind multicenter trial using lidocaine prilocaine dental gel.用于龈下刮治和根面平整的袋内麻醉:使用利多卡因丙胺卡因牙科凝胶的双盲多中心试验结果
J Periodontol. 2001 Jul;72(7):895-900. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.895.
5
Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of intra-pocket anesthetic gel and injected local anesthesia during scaling and root planing - A split-mouth clinical trial.龈袋内麻醉凝胶与局部注射麻醉在龈下刮治和根面平整术中有效性的比较评估——一项半口临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 May-Jun;28(3):281-285. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_489_16.
6
Efficacy of an intrapocket anesthetic for scaling and root planing procedures: a review of three multicenter studies.用于龈下刮治和根面平整术的袋内麻醉剂的疗效:三项多中心研究综述
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Feb;26(2 Suppl 1):6-10.
7
Influence of intra-pocket anesthesia gel on treatment outcome in periodontal patients: a randomized controlled trial.袋内麻醉凝胶对牙周病患者治疗效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 May;41(5):481-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12239. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
8
Reducing children's injection pain: lidocaine patches versus topical benzocaine gel.减轻儿童注射疼痛:利多卡因贴片与外用苯佐卡因凝胶的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):19-23.
9
Children's preference of benzocaine gel versus the lidocaine patch.儿童对苯佐卡因凝胶与利多卡因贴片的偏好。
Pediatr Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):401-5.
10
Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection.局部麻醉剂(复方利多卡因乳膏/奥布卡因凝胶与苯佐卡因)用于腭部注射针注射时疼痛的比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.033. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Liposomal anesthetic gel for pain control during periodontal therapy in adults: a placebo-controlled RCT.成人牙周病治疗中应用局部麻醉凝胶减轻疼痛的随机对照试验:安慰剂对照 RCT 研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Nov 25;28:e20190025. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0025. eCollection 2020.
2
Non-interventional study to collect data for the application of lidocaine gel 2% during scaling and root planing and professional mechanical plaque removal.非介入性研究,收集在洁治和根面平整以及专业机械菌斑去除过程中使用 2%利多卡因凝胶的数据。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):551-558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2468-0. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Anesthetic efficacy of Oraqix® versus Hurricaine® and placebo for pain control during non-surgical periodontal treatment.
Oraqix® 对比 Hurricaine® 和安慰剂在非手术牙周治疗中控制疼痛的麻醉效果。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Mar 1;19(2):e192-201. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19202.
4
Dental mold: a novel formulation to treat common dental disorders.牙科模具:一种治疗常见牙科疾病的新型配方。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(2):692-702. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9255-9. Epub 2009 May 23.