Ravesteijn W, Kroesen O
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Technology Dynamics and Sustainable Development, Jaffalaan 5, P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.
Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(4):105-11. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.542.
Present-day worldwide water problems require new management tools and sustainable system innovations. At Delft University of Technology research is being carried out into water resources and management development aimed at forming such tools and innovations, focused on Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM). One of the case-studies deals with Dutch water management and technology in the context of European IRBM in the form of the 2000 Water Frame Directive. The Netherlands experience many water problems and European IRBM could bring help by offering a framework for both international cooperation and technological innovations. To work as an adequate management tool European IRBM should be tailored to the Dutch water tradition, which recently culminated in Integrated Water Management. Both approaches are in some respects contradicting. Europe pursues, for example, centralized control; while the Dutch have their strongly water boards based decentralized administration. The tensions between both approaches require mutual adaptation, for which the concept of subsidiarity might offer points of departure. This paper describes the first results of the case-research into Dutch water management and technology in the context of Europe as well as the backgrounds and the set-up of the research as a whole.
当今全球的水资源问题需要新的管理工具和可持续的系统创新。代尔夫特理工大学正在开展关于水资源和管理发展的研究,旨在形成此类工具和创新,重点是综合流域管理(IRBM)。其中一个案例研究以2000年《水框架指令》的形式,探讨了欧洲综合流域管理背景下的荷兰水资源管理与技术。荷兰面临诸多水资源问题,欧洲综合流域管理可为国际合作和技术创新提供框架,从而带来帮助。要成为一个合适的管理工具,欧洲综合流域管理应根据荷兰的水管理传统进行调整,而荷兰的水管理传统最近发展为综合水资源管理。这两种方法在某些方面相互矛盾。例如,欧洲实行集中控制,而荷兰则有基于水务局的高度分散的管理体制。这两种方法之间的紧张关系需要相互适应,辅助性原则可能为此提供出发点。本文介绍了在欧洲背景下对荷兰水资源管理与技术进行案例研究的初步结果,以及整个研究的背景和设置。