Fletcher Stephen
School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Christchurch House, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Dec;54(12):1881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
The Marine Strategy Directive requires European Union Member States to develop science-based marine strategies with the involvement of stakeholders, in order that Europe's marine environment reaches 'good environmental status' by 2021. The scientific requirements of marine strategies are clearly defined within the Directive, however, the requirements related to stakeholder involvement are not. This paper presents a critical analysis of the provisions for stakeholder involvement with in the Marine Strategy Directive. In particular, the paper is focused upon the definition of stakeholder, the sequencing of involvement, and the form and purpose of involvement. The critique is set within an evaluative framework that considers policy-making to be a social process, rather than a purely scientific one. It is concluded that the Marine Strategy Directive lacks coherency with respect to stakeholder involvement which may perpetuate the traditional tension between marine science and policy. This in turn may compromise the ability of the Directive to protect Europe's marine environment.
《海洋战略指令》要求欧盟成员国在利益相关者的参与下制定基于科学的海洋战略,以使欧洲的海洋环境到2021年达到“良好环境状况”。该指令明确规定了海洋战略的科学要求,然而,与利益相关者参与相关的要求却未明确规定。本文对《海洋战略指令》中利益相关者参与的条款进行了批判性分析。具体而言,本文重点关注利益相关者的定义、参与的先后顺序以及参与的形式和目的。该批评是在一个评估框架内进行的,该框架认为决策是一个社会过程,而不是一个纯粹的科学过程。得出的结论是,《海洋战略指令》在利益相关者参与方面缺乏连贯性,这可能会使海洋科学与政策之间的传统紧张关系长期存在。这反过来可能会损害该指令保护欧洲海洋环境的能力。