Suppr超能文献

应激源、应对方式及应对效果:性别、运动类型与技能差异

Stressors, coping, and coping effectiveness: gender, type of sport, and skill differences.

作者信息

Nicholls Adam R, Polman Remco, Levy Andrew R, Taylor Jamie, Cobley Stephen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2007 Nov;25(13):1521-30. doi: 10.1080/02640410701230479.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine stressors, coping, and coping effectiveness as a function of gender, type of sport, and skill. The sample consisted of 749 undergraduate athletes (455 males, 294 females) aged 18-38 years (mean= 19.8 years). Skill was classified as international/national, county, university, and club standard. Participants completed a stressor and coping concept map (Novak & Gowin, 1984). The results revealed gender, type of sport, and skill differences in relation to stressor frequencies, coping strategy deployment, and coping effectiveness. In contrast to previous research, females used a variety of problem-focused (e.g. planning, communication, technique-orientated coping) strategies more frequently than males. Team sport athletes reported a variety of sport-specific stressors relating to the demands of playing in a team environment. The group of national/international athletes reported using more planning, blocking, and visualization, and also reported that their coping was more effective than that of less-skilled athletes.

摘要

本研究旨在考察压力源、应对方式及应对效果与性别、运动类型和技能之间的关系。样本包括749名18至38岁(平均19.8岁)的本科运动员(455名男性,294名女性)。技能分为国际/国家级、县级、大学级和俱乐部级标准。参与者完成了一份压力源与应对概念图(诺瓦克和戈温,1984年)。结果显示,在压力源频率、应对策略运用和应对效果方面存在性别、运动类型和技能差异。与以往研究不同的是,女性比男性更频繁地使用各种以问题为中心的策略(如计划、沟通、技术导向型应对)。团队运动运动员报告了与团队环境中比赛要求相关的各种特定于运动的压力源。国家级/国际级运动员群体报告使用了更多的计划、阻断和想象策略,并且还报告他们的应对比技能较低的运动员更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验