Dyszkiewicz-Korpanty Anna, Olteanu Horatiu, Frenkel Eugene P, Sarode Ravindra
Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Platelets. 2007 Nov;18(7):491-6. doi: 10.1080/09537100701280654.
Platelet aggregation inhibition by clopidogrel may be suboptimal in 4-30% of patients. Traditionally, optical aggregometry is used to assess clopidogrel's anti-platelet effects by inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation in platelet rich plasma. Red blood cells are an important source of ADP and, thus, are known to modulate platelet function. Because the whole blood aggregation by impedance method assesses platelet function in a physiological milieu, we compared clopidogrel response by this method with the optical method in platelet rich plasma (PRP) and the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100). Platelet function studies were performed in 17 healthy subjects at baseline and after 10 days of clopidogrel intake (75 mg/day). Optical and impedance aggregometry were performed after addition of ADP (10 and 20 microM) and collagen (1 and 2 microg/mL). For PFA-100 analysis, whole blood closure time was measured in collagen-coated cartridges with ADP and epinephrine. All subjects except one showed a decrease in ADP-induced aggregation using both aggregation methods. However, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited when assessed in whole blood as compared to the optical method (71+/- 34% vs. 34.2+/- 23%, p = 0.0002); this suggests that whole blood aggregometry is more sensitive in the detection of clopidogrel effect in the presence of red cells, which are known to modulate platelet function. The PFA-100 ADP closure time was slightly prolonged above the reference interval in only 5/17 (29%) subjects, suggesting that this instrument is not able to detect clopidogrel effect. We conclude that whole blood aggregation appears to be more sensitive in detecting clopidogrel effect compared with the platelet rich plasma method; the PFA-100 was unable to detect clopidogrel effect in the majority of the subjects.
在4% - 30%的患者中,氯吡格雷对血小板聚集的抑制作用可能未达最佳效果。传统上,光学聚集测定法通过抑制富含血小板血浆中ADP诱导的聚集来评估氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用。红细胞是ADP的重要来源,因此已知其可调节血小板功能。由于阻抗法全血聚集在生理环境中评估血小板功能,我们将此方法检测的氯吡格雷反应与富含血小板血浆(PRP)中的光学方法以及血小板功能分析仪(PFA - 100)进行了比较。对17名健康受试者在基线时以及服用氯吡格雷(75毫克/天)10天后进行血小板功能研究。加入ADP(10和20微摩尔)和胶原蛋白(1和2微克/毫升)后进行光学和阻抗聚集测定。对于PFA - 100分析,在含ADP和肾上腺素的胶原蛋白包被的检测池中测量全血封闭时间。除一名受试者外,所有受试者使用两种聚集方法时ADP诱导的聚集均降低。然而,与光学方法相比,在全血中评估时ADP诱导的血小板聚集受到显著抑制(71±34%对34.2±23%,p = 0.0002);这表明在已知可调节血小板功能的红细胞存在的情况下,全血聚集测定法在检测氯吡格雷效果方面更敏感。仅5/17(29%)的受试者中PFA - 100 ADP封闭时间略延长至参考区间以上,表明该仪器无法检测到氯吡格雷的效果。我们得出结论,与富含血小板血浆法相比,全血聚集在检测氯吡格雷效果方面似乎更敏感;在大多数受试者中,PFA - 100无法检测到氯吡格雷的效果。