• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discordance in tests used to detect inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor in patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures.用于检测接受介入神经放射学手术的患者 P2Y12 受体抑制的检测方法之间存在差异。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;29(6):655-664. doi: 10.1177/15910199221122858. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
A comparison of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay for the assessment of clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中评估氯吡格雷抵抗的 INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y 和 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测的比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2012 Jul;26(4):262-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21515.
3
Hematocrit alters VerifyNow P2Y12 assay results independently of intrinsic platelet reactivity and clopidogrel responsiveness.红细胞压积可独立于内在血小板反应性和氯吡格雷反应性改变 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测结果。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;11(10):1814-22. doi: 10.1111/jth.12376.
4
Clopidogrel Resistance in Neurovascular Stenting: Correlations between Light Transmission Aggregometry, VerifyNow, and the Multiplate.神经血管支架置入术中的氯吡格雷抵抗:透光聚集试验、VerifyNow和Multiplate之间的相关性
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1953-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4388. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Poor agreement between light transmission aggregometry, Verify Now P2Y₁₂ and vasodilatator-stimulated phosphoprotein for clopidogrel low-response assessment: a potential explanation of negative results of recent randomized trials.光透射聚集法、Verify Now P2Y₁₂检测法和血管舒张刺激磷蛋白检测法在评估氯吡格雷低反应性方面的一致性较差:对近期随机试验阴性结果的一种可能解释。
Platelets. 2014;25(7):499-505. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.840363. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Comparison of a new P2Y12 receptor specific platelet aggregation test with other laboratory methods in stroke patients on clopidogrel monotherapy.比较新型 P2Y12 受体特异性血小板聚集试验与氯吡格雷单药治疗的脑卒中患者其他实验室检测方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e69417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069417. Print 2013.
7
Comparison of conventional aggregometry with VASP for monitoring P2Y12-specific platelet inhibition.比较传统的聚集仪与 VASP 监测 P2Y12 特异性血小板抑制作用。
Platelets. 2010;21(7):563-70. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2010.494742.
8
Comparison of four methods to assess high-on platelet reactivity under P2Y12 receptor inhibitor.比较四种方法评估 P2Y12 受体抑制剂下的高血小板反应性。
Platelets. 2018 May;29(3):257-264. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1453058. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel.ADP 诱导的血小板反应性在氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗的初始阶段表现出明显的年龄依赖性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;8(1):37-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03644.x. Epub 2009 Oct 10.
10
Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.在强效 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗的患者中,比较光传输聚集与阻抗聚集。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;26(3):260-268. doi: 10.1177/1074248420968706. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory monitoring of P2Y inhibitors: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.P2Y 抑制剂的实验室监测:来自国际血栓与止血学会科学标准化委员会的通讯
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Nov;16(11):2341-2346. doi: 10.1111/jth.14282. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Platelet testing in flow diversion: a review of the evidence.血流导向治疗中的血小板检测:证据综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E5. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1746.
3
Monitoring Antiplatelet Therapy.监测抗血小板治疗
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2017 Apr;43(3):311-319. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597298. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Clopidogrel Resistance in Neurovascular Stenting: Correlations between Light Transmission Aggregometry, VerifyNow, and the Multiplate.神经血管支架置入术中的氯吡格雷抵抗:透光聚集试验、VerifyNow和Multiplate之间的相关性
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1953-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4388. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention.抗血小板治疗致出血和支架血栓形成:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性对危险分层作用的协作分析。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1762-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv104. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
6
Use of thromboelastography to tailor dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device.使用血栓弹力图为接受Pipeline栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的患者定制双重抗血小板治疗方案。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jun;7(6):425-30. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011089. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
7
Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value.使用Pipeline栓塞装置进行血栓栓塞并发症:手术时间、支架数量及术前P2Y12反应单位(PRU)值的影响
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Mar;7(3):217-21. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
8
Platelet function testing in atherothrombotic disease.动脉血栓疾病的血小板功能检测。
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(33):5379-91. doi: 10.2174/138161212803251862.
9
Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.比较血小板功能检测在预测行冠状动脉支架植入术患者临床结局中的应用。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):754-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.181.
10
Platelet function testing and implications for clinical practice.血小板功能检测及其临床应用
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;14(3):157-69. doi: 10.1177/1074248409339309.

用于检测接受介入神经放射学手术的患者 P2Y12 受体抑制的检测方法之间存在差异。

Discordance in tests used to detect inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor in patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures.

机构信息

Departments of Coagulation and Transfusion Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.

Departments of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;29(6):655-664. doi: 10.1177/15910199221122858. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221122858
PMID:36039509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10680952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel is an inhibitor of the P2Y12 platelet receptor but testing to demonstrate a drug effect is controversial since there are often discordant results between different tests methods.

METHODS

Samples from patients taking clopidogrel prior to intracranial flow-diversion procedures were tested using light transmission aggregometry (LTA), whole blood impedance aggregometry (WBIA) and the VerifyNow device (VND). Samples were classified as concordant if all test results were either responsive (inhibition) or resistant. Discordant results were separated using the VND into those with a responsive versus a resistant test result.

RESULTS

Samples from 96 patients were studied. Concordance for all three tests was seen in 53/96 (55%) of samples, of which 41 (43%) were responsive and 12 (12%) were resistant. Discordance was observed in 43 samples (45%), 37 (28%) of which were caused by responsive VND and either a resistant WBIA or LTA and 6 (7%) of which were caused by a resistant VND but a responsive test result using either WBIA or LTA. These two discordant groups differed in both platelet count and hematocrit, but no such difference was present between the two concordant groups.

CONCLUSION

Discordance in P2Y12 inhibition testing may be partly explained by sample platelet count and hematocrit.

摘要

背景

氯吡格雷是 P2Y12 血小板受体抑制剂,但检测药物效果存在争议,因为不同的测试方法之间通常存在不一致的结果。

方法

在颅内血流分流术之前服用氯吡格雷的患者样本使用光透射聚集测定法(LTA)、全血阻抗聚集测定法(WBIA)和 VerifyNow 设备(VND)进行测试。如果所有测试结果均为反应性(抑制)或耐药性,则将样本分类为一致性。使用 VND 将不一致的结果分为反应性与耐药性测试结果。

结果

研究了 96 例患者的样本。在 53/96(55%)的样本中观察到所有三种测试的一致性,其中 41(43%)为反应性,12(12%)为耐药性。在 43 个样本中观察到不一致(45%),其中 37 个(28%)是由反应性 VND 和耐药性 WBIA 或 LTA 引起的,6 个(7%)是由耐药性 VND 引起的,但使用 WBIA 或 LTA 进行的测试结果为反应性。这两个不一致的组在血小板计数和红细胞压积方面存在差异,但在两个一致性组之间没有这种差异。

结论

P2Y12 抑制测试中的不一致可能部分归因于样本血小板计数和红细胞压积。