• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有和没有创伤性脑损伤的儿童处理速度困难的个案分析

Individual case analysis of processing speed difficulties in children with and without traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Prigatano George P, Gray Jennifer A, Gale Shawn D

机构信息

Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Jul;22(4):603-19. doi: 10.1080/13854040701440501.

DOI:10.1080/13854040701440501
PMID:17853123
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine the frequency of processing speed difficulties relative to estimates of other problem-solving abilities in children with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). The two samples consisted of 213 normally functioning school-age children and 65 TBI children and 19 trauma controls. All children were administered the WISC-III/IV Vocabulary, Block Design, and Coding subtests. The frequency of children in each sample having a Coding subtest score of 3 or 4 scale points below the Vocabulary or Block Design score (whichever one was lower) was calculated. Using a 3-point scale difference, the presence of processing speed deficits relative to other cognitive abilities in the school sample was low (5.2%), and was equivalent to that demonstrated by trauma controls (5.3%). However, in the TBI sample, 18 out of 65 TBI patients (27.7%) showed this same pattern. Using a 4-point discrepancy scale, 3.3% of normal children and 16.9% of TBI children showed this pattern. The frequency of this pattern increased with severity of TBI, using two different but related classification systems. These preliminary findings require cross validation in a larger sample before definite conclusions can be reached.

摘要

开展了两项研究,以确定有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和无创伤性脑损伤儿童在处理速度困难方面的频率,并与其他解决问题能力的评估结果进行比较。两个样本分别由213名正常学龄儿童、65名TBI儿童和19名创伤对照儿童组成。所有儿童均接受了韦氏儿童智力量表第三版/第四版(WISC-III/IV)的词汇、积木图案和译码子测试。计算了每个样本中译码子测试得分比词汇或积木图案得分(取较低者)低3或4个量表分的儿童的频率。以3分的量表差异来看,在校样本中相对于其他认知能力存在处理速度缺陷的比例较低(5.2%),与创伤对照儿童的比例相当(5.3%)。然而,在TBI样本中,65名TBI患者中有18名(27.7%)表现出相同的模式。以4分的差异量表来看,3.3%的正常儿童和16.9%的TBI儿童表现出这种模式。使用两种不同但相关的分类系统,这种模式的频率随着TBI严重程度的增加而上升。在得出明确结论之前,这些初步发现需要在更大的样本中进行交叉验证。

相似文献

1
Individual case analysis of processing speed difficulties in children with and without traumatic brain injury.有和没有创伤性脑损伤的儿童处理速度困难的个案分析
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Jul;22(4):603-19. doi: 10.1080/13854040701440501.
2
Functional outcome in TBI II: verbal memory and information processing speed mediators.创伤性脑损伤II的功能结果:言语记忆和信息处理速度中介因素
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 May;28(4):581-91. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434474.
3
WISC-IV profiles in children with traumatic brain injury: similarities to and differences from the WISC-III.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版在创伤性脑损伤儿童中的表现:与韦氏智力量表第三版的相似与不同。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):57-64. doi: 10.1037/a0016056.
4
Discourse macrolevel processing after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿重度创伤性脑损伤后的语篇宏观层面加工
Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;25(1-2):37-60. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2004.9651921.
5
Components of executive function in typically developing and head-injured children.正常发育儿童和头部受伤儿童的执行功能组成部分。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;25(1-2):61-83. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2004.9651922.
6
Discrepancies between the California Verbal Learning Test: Children's Version and the Children's Category Test after pediatric traumatic brain injury.儿科创伤性脑损伤后加利福尼亚言语学习测试儿童版与儿童类别测试之间的差异。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Jul;11(4):386-91.
7
Performance discrepancies on the California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version (CVLT-C) in children with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤儿童在加利福尼亚言语学习测验儿童版(CVLT-C)上的表现差异。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Jul;10(4):482-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704104025.
8
Late neurologic and cognitive sequelae of inflicted traumatic brain injury in infancy.婴儿期遭受创伤性脑损伤的迟发性神经和认知后遗症。
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e174-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2739.
9
Neuropsychologic and functional outcome after complicated mild traumatic brain injury.复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤后的神经心理学和功能预后
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):904-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.029.
10
Generalizability of WISC-IV index and subtest score profiles in children with traumatic brain injury.WISC-IV 指数和分量表分数在脑损伤儿童中的可推广性。
Child Neuropsychol. 2012;18(5):512-9. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2011.628308. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of White Matter Integrity after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤后白质完整性的评估。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Oct 15;37(20):2188-2197. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6691. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Classification of intellectual disability using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Full Scale IQ or General Abilities Index?采用韦氏儿童智力量表进行智力障碍分类:采用全量表智商还是一般能力指数?
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Sep;55(9):840-5. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12201. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research.
儿童创伤性脑损伤研究中常用结局指标的使用建议。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 1;29(4):678-705. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1838. Epub 2011 Aug 24.