• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强烈的互惠还是强烈的凶猛?利他惩罚进化的群体遗传学观点。

Strong reciprocity or strong ferocity? A population genetic view of the evolution of altruistic punishment.

作者信息

Lehmann Laurent, Rousset François, Roze Denis, Keller Laurent

机构信息

Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2007 Jul;170(1):21-36. doi: 10.1086/518568. Epub 2007 May 11.

DOI:10.1086/518568
PMID:17853989
Abstract

Strong reciprocity, defined as a predisposition to help others and to punish those that are not helping, has been proposed as a potent force leading to the evolution of cooperation and altruism. However, the conditions under which strong reciprocity might be favored are not clear. Here we investigate the selective pressure on strong reciprocity by letting both limited dispersal (i.e., spatial structure) and recombination between helping and punishment jointly determine the evolutionary dynamics of strong reciprocity. Our analytical model suggests that when helping and punishment are perfectly linked traits (no recombination occurring between them), strong reciprocity can spread even when the initial frequency of strong reciprocators is close to 0 in the population (i.e., a rare mutant can invade). By contrast, our results indicate that when recombination can occur between helping and punishment (i.e., both traits coevolve) and is stronger than selection, punishment is likely to invade a population of defectors only when it gives a direct fitness benefit to the actor. Overall, our results delineate the conditions under which strong reciprocity is selected for in a spatially structured population and highlight that the forces behind its evolution involves kinship (be it genetic or cultural).

摘要

强烈互惠被定义为帮助他人以及惩罚不提供帮助者的一种倾向,它被认为是推动合作与利他行为进化的一股强大力量。然而,强烈互惠可能受到青睐的条件尚不清楚。在此,我们通过让有限扩散(即空间结构)以及帮助与惩罚之间的重组共同决定强烈互惠的进化动态,来研究对强烈互惠的选择压力。我们的分析模型表明,当帮助与惩罚是完全连锁的性状(它们之间不发生重组)时,即使在群体中强烈互惠者的初始频率接近0(即一个罕见的突变体能够入侵),强烈互惠也能够传播开来。相比之下,我们的结果表明,当帮助与惩罚之间能够发生重组(即两种性状共同进化)且重组强于选择时,只有当惩罚给行为者带来直接的适应性益处时,惩罚才有可能入侵一个背叛者群体。总体而言,我们的结果描绘了在空间结构化群体中选择强烈互惠的条件,并强调其进化背后的力量涉及亲属关系(无论是遗传的还是文化的)。

相似文献

1
Strong reciprocity or strong ferocity? A population genetic view of the evolution of altruistic punishment.强烈的互惠还是强烈的凶猛?利他惩罚进化的群体遗传学观点。
Am Nat. 2007 Jul;170(1):21-36. doi: 10.1086/518568. Epub 2007 May 11.
2
The co-evolution of culturally inherited altruistic helping and cultural transmission under random group formation.随机群体形成下文化传承的利他性帮助与文化传播的共同进化。
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Jun;73(4):506-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
3
Altruistic punishment in humans.人类中的利他惩罚。
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40. doi: 10.1038/415137a.
4
Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.通过形象评分实现间接互惠的进化。
Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7. doi: 10.1038/31225.
5
The evolution of trans-generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction.跨代利他行为的演变:亲缘选择与生态位构建
J Evol Biol. 2007 Jan;20(1):181-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01202.x.
6
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.社会语义学:利他主义、合作、互利共生、强互惠性与群体选择。
J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):415-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x.
7
Effect of the presence of empty sites on the evolution of cooperation by costly punishment in spatial games.空间博弈中,空位的存在对通过代价高昂的惩罚实现合作进化的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 21;256(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
8
The coevolution of altruism and punishment: role of the selfish punisher.利他主义与惩罚的共同进化:自私惩罚者的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Jun 7;240(3):475-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
9
Runaway selection for cooperation and strict-and-severe punishment.对合作的失控选择与严厉惩罚
J Theor Biol. 2009 Mar 7;257(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
10
Cultural transmission can inhibit the evolution of altruistic helping.文化传播会抑制利他帮助行为的进化。
Am Nat. 2008 Jul;172(1):12-24. doi: 10.1086/587851.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture and group-functional punishment behaviour.文化与群体功能性惩罚行为
Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Aug 1;4:e35. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.32. eCollection 2022.
2
Punishment: one tool, many uses.惩罚:一种工具,多种用途。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Nov 12;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.12. eCollection 2019.
3
Cultural group selection and human cooperation: a conceptual and empirical review.文化群体选择与人类合作:概念与实证综述
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 7;2:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.2. eCollection 2020.
4
Ancestral social environments plus nonlinear benefits can explain cooperation in human societies.祖先的社会环境加上非线性的好处可以解释人类社会中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 24;12(1):20252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24590-y.
5
The evolution of manipulative cheating.手法作弊的演变。
Elife. 2022 Oct 4;11:e80611. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80611.
6
Decoupling cooperation and punishment in humans shows that punishment is not an altruistic trait.人类合作与惩罚的脱钩表明,惩罚不是一种利他的特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 10;288(1962):20211611. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1611.
7
Direct punishment and indirect reputation-based tactics to intervene against offences.直接惩罚和间接基于声誉的策略来干预犯罪。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0289. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness.利他主义的进化和亲属关系作用的反复发现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 17;117(46):28894-28898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013596117. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
Pleiotropy, cooperation, and the social evolution of genetic architecture.多效性、协同作用与遗传结构的社会进化。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 25;16(10):e2006671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006671. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Helping in humans and other animals: a fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue.在人类和其他动物中的帮助行为:一场富有成效的跨学科对话。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0929.