Suppr超能文献

客观监测的弱视治疗配镜方案:随机试验

Objectively monitored patching regimens for treatment of amblyopia: randomised trial.

作者信息

Stewart Catherine E, Stephens David A, Fielder Alistair R, Moseley Merrick J

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London EC1V 0HB.

出版信息

BMJ. 2007 Oct 6;335(7622):707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39301.460150.55. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare visual outcome in response to two prescribed rates of occlusion (six hours a day and 12 hours a day).

DESIGN

Unmasked randomised trial.

SETTING

Research clinics in two London hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

97 children with a confirmed diagnosis of amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both.

INTERVENTIONS

18 week period of wearing glasses (refractive adaptation) followed by occlusion prescribed ("patching") for six or 12 hours a day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity measured by logMAR letter recognition; objectively monitored rate of occlusion (hours a day).

RESULTS

The mean age of children at study entry was 5.6 (SD 1.5) years. Ninety were eligible for occlusion but 10 dropped out in this phase, leaving 80 children who were randomised to a prescribed dose rate of six (n=40) or 12 (n=40) hours a day. The mean change in visual acuity of the amblyopic eye was not significantly different (P=0.64) between the two groups (0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.31) log units in six hour group; 0.24 (0.19 to 0.29) log units in 12 hour group). The mean dose rates (hours a day) actually received, however, were also not significantly different (4.2 (3.7 to 4.7) in six hour group v 6.2 (5.1 to 7.3) in 12 hour group; P=0.06). The visual outcome was similar for those children who received three to six hours a day or more than six to 12 hours a day, but significantly better than that in children who received less than three hours a day. Children aged under 4 required significantly less occlusion than older children. Visual outcome was not influenced by type of amblyopia.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial (six hours a day) and maximal (12 hours a day) prescribed occlusion results in similar visual outcome. On average, the occlusion dose received in the maximal group was only 50% more than in the substantial group and in both groups was much less than that prescribed. Younger children required the least occlusion.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials NCT00274664.

摘要

目的

比较针对两种规定的遮盖时长(每天6小时和每天12小时)的视力改善情况。

设计

非盲法随机试验。

地点

伦敦两家医院的研究诊所。

参与者

97名确诊患有与斜视、屈光参差或两者相关的弱视儿童。

干预措施

佩戴眼镜18周(屈光适应期),随后每天遮盖(“眼罩遮盖”)6小时或12小时。

主要观察指标

采用logMAR字母识别法测量视力;客观监测遮盖时长(每天小时数)。

结果

研究开始时儿童平均年龄为5.6(标准差1.5)岁。90名儿童符合遮盖条件,但此阶段有10名退出,剩余80名儿童被随机分配至每天规定遮盖时长为6小时(n = 40)或12小时(n = 40)的组。两组弱视眼视力的平均变化无显著差异(P = 0.64)(6小时组为0.26(95%置信区间0.21至0.31)对数单位;12小时组为0.24(0.19至0.29)对数单位)。然而,实际接受的平均遮盖时长(每天小时数)也无显著差异(6小时组为4.2(3.7至4.7),12小时组为6.2(5.1至7.3);P = 0.06)。每天接受3至6小时或超过6至12小时遮盖的儿童视力改善情况相似,但显著优于每天接受少于3小时遮盖的儿童。4岁以下儿童所需的遮盖时长明显少于年龄较大的儿童。视力改善情况不受弱视类型影响。

结论

规定的大量(每天6小时)和最大量(每天12小时)遮盖产生相似的视力改善效果。平均而言,最大量组接受的遮盖量仅比大量组多50%,且两组均远低于规定量。年龄较小的儿童所需遮盖量最少。

试验注册

临床试验NCT00274664。

相似文献

4
Randomized evaluation of spectacles plus alternate-day occlusion to treat amblyopia.随机评估眼镜加隔日遮盖治疗弱视。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb;117(2):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for improving adherence to amblyopia treatments in children.改善儿童弱视治疗依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015820.pub2.
3
Binocular Approaches in Amblyopia Treatment Based on Dichoptic Stimulation.基于双眼分视刺激的弱视治疗中的双眼治疗方法。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 25;55(3):148-158. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.06626. Epub 2025 May 21.
6
Childhood amblyopia: A systematic review of recent management options.儿童弱视:近期治疗方案的系统评价
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 6;38(3):201-213. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_212_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
7
Leveraging neural plasticity for the treatment of amblyopia.利用神经可塑性治疗弱视。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep-Oct;69(5):818-832. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 May 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Patching regimens for amblyopia.弱视的遮盖疗法方案
Ophthalmology. 2005 Apr;112(4):736-7; author reply 737. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.006.
9
Patching regimens.贴片治疗方案。
Ophthalmology. 2004 May;111(5):1063; author reply 1064-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验