Suppr超能文献

制备技术、窝沟形态及材料特性对窝沟封闭剂体外边缘渗透性和穿透性的影响

Effect of preparation technique, fissure morphology, and material characteristics on the in vitro margin permeability and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.

作者信息

Selecman James B, Owens Barry M, Johnson William W

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Tennessee College of Dentistry Memphis, Tenn, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2007 Jul-Aug;29(4):308-14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of material characteristics, preparation techniques, and fissure morphology on the microleakage and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.

METHODS

Sealants used in the study included: (1) Aegis; (2) Conseal f; (3) Admira Seal; (4) Triage; and (5) Delton Opaque. A total of 100 extracted permanent molars were randomly assigned to 10 groups that combined the materials and preparation technique (pumice prophylaxis and air abrasion). Following sealant placement, the specimens were: (1) subjected to thermal-cycling and dye immersion; (2) invested in acrylic; (3) sectioned for microscopic examination; and (4) assessed for dye penetration (microleakage) and penetrability.

RESULTS

Significant differences in microleakage were seen. Aegis using pumice-prophylaxis surface pretreatment showed significantly less leakage than the other groups. Significant differences were also exhibited between groups seen regarding sealant penetrability, with Delton and Triage (pumice prophylaxis) revealing the greatest values. Fissure morphology was not a significant factor regarding microleakage. Morphology did significantly impact sealant penetrability, however, with u-type fissures displaying the greatest values. No correlation was found between the extent of microleakage and sealant penetrability.

CONCLUSION

Material characteristics and fissure morphology were significant factors regarding sealant success, while surface preparation did not play an important role in sealant microleakage or fissure penetrability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估材料特性、制备技术和窝沟形态对窝沟封闭剂微渗漏和渗透性的影响。

方法

本研究中使用的封闭剂包括:(1)宙斯盾;(2)康赛封f;(3)爱美拉封闭剂;(4)分诊;(5)德尔顿不透明型。总共100颗拔除的恒牙被随机分为10组,这些组结合了材料和制备技术(浮石预防性处理和气蚀)。放置封闭剂后,对标本进行:(1)热循环和染料浸泡;(2)包埋在丙烯酸树脂中;(3)切片进行显微镜检查;(4)评估染料渗透(微渗漏)和渗透性。

结果

观察到微渗漏存在显著差异。使用浮石预防性表面预处理的宙斯盾显示出比其他组显著更少的渗漏。在封闭剂渗透性方面,各组之间也表现出显著差异,德尔顿和分诊(浮石预防性处理)显示出最高值。窝沟形态不是微渗漏的显著因素。然而,形态确实对封闭剂渗透性有显著影响,U型窝沟显示出最高值。未发现微渗漏程度与封闭剂渗透性之间存在相关性。

结论

材料特性和窝沟形态是封闭剂成功的重要因素,而表面处理在封闭剂微渗漏或窝沟渗透性方面不起重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验