Marks Derek, Owens Barry M, Johnson William W
Quintessence Int. 2009 Oct;40(9):763-72.
To evaluate the effect of adhesive agents and fissure morphology on the microleakage and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.
Sealants used in this study included Aegis (Bosworth), conseal f (Southern Dental Industries), and Admira Seal (Voco). Adhesive agents included Optibond Solo Plus (sds/Kerr) and Clearfil S3Bond (Kuraray). Ninety extracted permanent molars were randomly assigned to 9 groups combining sealant and adhesive agent materials. A sealant and control group (phosphoric acid etch only) was also included. Dye penetration (microleakage), penetrability, and fissure morphology assessment was performed for the treatment groups through microscopic evaluation.
Significant (P = .003) differences in microleakage were exhibited, with the Aegis + control and Aegis + Optibond Solo Plus groups displaying less leakage, while significant (P = .03) differences were also noted between groups regarding penetrability. Fissure morphology was not a significant (P = .82) factor affecting microleakage; however, fissure type did significantly (P < .001) impact penetrability. No correlation was found between the extent of microleakage and penetrability.
Application of sealants using phosphoric acid as a conditioning agent revealed superior results, while the use of adhesives was found to be unnecessary.
评估粘结剂和窝沟形态对窝沟封闭剂微渗漏和渗透性的影响。
本研究中使用的封闭剂包括Aegis(博斯沃思公司)、conseal f(南方牙科工业公司)和Admira Seal(沃科公司)。粘结剂包括Optibond Solo Plus(sds/克尔公司)和Clearfil S3Bond(可乐丽公司)。90颗拔除的恒牙被随机分为9组,将封闭剂和粘结剂材料组合。还包括一个封闭剂对照组(仅用磷酸酸蚀)。通过显微镜评估对治疗组进行染料渗透(微渗漏)、渗透性和窝沟形态评估。
微渗漏方面存在显著差异(P = 0.003),Aegis + 对照组和Aegis + Optibond Solo Plus组的渗漏较少,而在渗透性方面各组之间也存在显著差异(P = 0.03)。窝沟形态不是影响微渗漏的显著因素(P = 0.82);然而,窝沟类型确实对渗透性有显著影响(P < 0.001)。未发现微渗漏程度与渗透性之间存在相关性。
使用磷酸作为处理剂应用封闭剂显示出更好的效果,而发现使用粘结剂是不必要的。