Suppr超能文献

[食管癌放射治疗中三种不同分割方式的比较——一项针对80例患者的前瞻性随机试验]

[Comparison of three different fractionations in radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma--a prospective randomized trial on 80 patients].

作者信息

Peng K G

机构信息

Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Bengbu.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1991 May;13(3):232-4.

PMID:1786763
Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial on three different kinds of fractionation in radiotherapy for 80 patients with esophageal carcinoma was carried out from March 1987 to September 1987. The fractionation schemes were: Group A- routine fractionation; Group B- accelerated hyperfractionation with twice-a-day irradiation; and Group C- accelerated hyperfractionation with three-times-a-day irradiation. The 2-year survival rates of the respective groups were: Group A- 18.5% (5/27); Group B- 44.4% (12/27); and Group C- 26.9% (7/26). The difference in survivals was statistically significant between Groups B and C (P less than 0.05) but not between Groups A and C (P greater than 0.05). Though with limited duration of follow-up, the authors prefer the twice-a-day accelerated hyperfractionation scheme for esophageal carcinoma.

摘要

1987年3月至1987年9月,对80例食管癌患者进行了一项关于三种不同放疗分割方式的前瞻性随机临床试验。分割方案如下:A组——常规分割;B组——一天两次照射的加速超分割;C组——一天三次照射的加速超分割。各组的2年生存率分别为:A组——18.5%(5/27);B组——44.4%(12/27);C组——26.9%(7/26)。B组和C组之间的生存率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组和C组之间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。尽管随访时间有限,作者更倾向于食管癌一天两次的加速超分割方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验