Suppr超能文献

[食管癌放射治疗中三种不同分割方式的比较——一项针对80例患者的前瞻性随机试验]

[Comparison of three different fractionations in radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma--a prospective randomized trial on 80 patients].

作者信息

Peng K G

机构信息

Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Bengbu.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1991 May;13(3):232-4.

PMID:1786763
Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial on three different kinds of fractionation in radiotherapy for 80 patients with esophageal carcinoma was carried out from March 1987 to September 1987. The fractionation schemes were: Group A- routine fractionation; Group B- accelerated hyperfractionation with twice-a-day irradiation; and Group C- accelerated hyperfractionation with three-times-a-day irradiation. The 2-year survival rates of the respective groups were: Group A- 18.5% (5/27); Group B- 44.4% (12/27); and Group C- 26.9% (7/26). The difference in survivals was statistically significant between Groups B and C (P less than 0.05) but not between Groups A and C (P greater than 0.05). Though with limited duration of follow-up, the authors prefer the twice-a-day accelerated hyperfractionation scheme for esophageal carcinoma.

摘要

1987年3月至1987年9月,对80例食管癌患者进行了一项关于三种不同放疗分割方式的前瞻性随机临床试验。分割方案如下:A组——常规分割;B组——一天两次照射的加速超分割;C组——一天三次照射的加速超分割。各组的2年生存率分别为:A组——18.5%(5/27);B组——44.4%(12/27);C组——26.9%(7/26)。B组和C组之间的生存率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组和C组之间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。尽管随访时间有限,作者更倾向于食管癌一天两次的加速超分割方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验