Mastny Ethan A, de Pablo Juan J
Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1691, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2007 Sep 14;127(10):104504. doi: 10.1063/1.2753149.
Literature estimates of the melting curve of the Lennard-Jones system vary by as much as 10%. The origin of such discrepancies remains unclear. We present precise values for the Lennard-Jones melting temperature, and we examine possible sources of systematic errors in the prediction of melting points, including finite-size and interaction-cutoff effects. A hypothetical thermodynamic integration path is used to find the relative free energies of the solid and liquid phases, for various system sizes, at constant cutoff radius. The solid-liquid relative free energy and melting temperature scale linearly as the inverse of the number of particles, and it is shown that finite-size effects can account for deviations in the melting temperature (from the infinite-size limit) of up to 5%. An extended-ensemble density-of-states method is used to determine free energy changes for each phase as a continuous function of the cutoff radius. The resulting melting temperature predictions exhibit an oscillatory behavior as the cutoff radius is increased. Deviations in the melting temperature (from the full potential limit) arising from a finite cutoff radius are shown to be of comparable magnitude as those resulting from finite-size effects. This method is used to identify melting temperatures at five different pressures, for the infinite-size and full potential Lennard-Jones system. We use our simulation results as references to connect the Lennard-Jones solid equation of state of van der Hoef with the Lennard-Jones fluid equation of state of Johnson. Once the references are applied the two equations of state are used to identify a melting curve. An empirical equation that fits this melting curve is provided. We also report a reduced triple point temperature T(tr)=0.694.
关于 Lennard-Jones 系统熔化曲线的文献估计值相差高达 10%。这种差异的来源尚不清楚。我们给出了 Lennard-Jones 熔化温度的精确值,并研究了熔点预测中系统误差的可能来源,包括有限尺寸和相互作用截止效应。使用一个假设的热力学积分路径来找到在恒定截止半径下,不同系统尺寸的固相和液相的相对自由能。固液相对自由能和熔化温度与粒子数的倒数呈线性比例关系,结果表明有限尺寸效应可以解释熔化温度(相对于无限尺寸极限)高达 5% 的偏差。使用扩展系综态密度方法来确定每个相的自由能变化作为截止半径的连续函数。随着截止半径的增加,由此得到的熔化温度预测呈现出振荡行为。有限截止半径引起的熔化温度偏差(相对于全势极限)与有限尺寸效应引起的偏差幅度相当。该方法用于确定无限尺寸和全势 Lennard-Jones 系统在五个不同压力下的熔化温度。我们使用模拟结果作为参考,将范德霍夫的 Lennard-Jones 固体状态方程与约翰逊的 Lennard-Jones 流体状态方程联系起来。一旦应用这些参考,就使用这两个状态方程来确定一条熔化曲线。提供了一个拟合该熔化曲线的经验方程。我们还报告了一个约化三相点温度 T(tr)=0.694。