• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测血糖控制:是否有证据支持合理使用糖化血红蛋白的常规检测?

Monitoring glycaemic control: is there evidence for appropriate use of routine measurement of glycated haemoglobin?

作者信息

Salvagno Gian Luca, Lippi Giuseppe, Targher Giovanni, Montagnana Martina, Guidi Gian Cesare

机构信息

Sezione di Chimica Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(8):1065-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.195.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2007.195
PMID:17867995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regardless of the available recommendations to perform glycated haemoglobin testing at a 2- to 3-month frequency, there is increasing evidence of an inappropriate laboratory use of this test in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from our Laboratory Information System were analysed for glycated haemoglobin test orders over a 3-year period using Microsoft Excel to calculate the order intervals and the test frequency for each patient. To assess the appropriateness of repeat testing, only data for patients who had at least two separate glycated haemoglobin test results were included in the analysis. Inappropriate test orders were defined as any order for a given patient taking place within a 29- or 89-day period following the previous order.

RESULTS

The results of our investigation demonstrate that inappropriate laboratory utilisation of this test is commonplace (26% of total repeat orders within 90 days), especially for inpatients (63.7% of inpatient repeat orders in less than 90 days). When stratifying glycated haemoglobin test results according to the >7% threshold, the frequency of inappropriate laboratory use (>90 days) was surprisingly greater among inpatients with a previous value of <7% than among those with a previous value of >7% (57.6% vs. 42.4%). The frequency of inappropriate glycated haemoglobin repeat test orders was lower among outpatients with a previous value of <7% than in outpatients with a previous value of >7% (64.8% vs. 35.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that more accurate application of the current recommendations would be advisable to decrease unnecessary testing and prevent avoidable health expenditure.

摘要

背景

尽管有建议称糖化血红蛋白检测应每2至3个月进行一次,但越来越多的证据表明,在临床实践中该检测在实验室的使用存在不当之处。

方法

使用Microsoft Excel分析我们实验室信息系统中3年内糖化血红蛋白检测订单的数据,以计算每个患者的订单间隔和检测频率。为评估重复检测的合理性,分析仅纳入至少有两次独立糖化血红蛋白检测结果的患者数据。不当检测订单定义为给定患者在上次订单后的29天或89天内进行的任何订单。

结果

我们的调查结果表明,该检测在实验室的不当使用很常见(90天内的重复订单占总重复订单的26%),尤其是住院患者(90天内住院患者的重复订单占63.7%)。根据>7%的阈值对糖化血红蛋白检测结果进行分层时,先前值<7%的住院患者中不当实验室使用(>90天)的频率出人意料地高于先前值>7%的患者(57.6%对42.4%)。先前值<7%的门诊患者中糖化血红蛋白重复检测订单的频率低于先前值>7%的门诊患者(64.8%对35.2%)。

结论

我们得出结论,建议更准确地应用当前建议,以减少不必要的检测并防止可避免的医疗支出。

相似文献

1
Monitoring glycaemic control: is there evidence for appropriate use of routine measurement of glycated haemoglobin?监测血糖控制:是否有证据支持合理使用糖化血红蛋白的常规检测?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(8):1065-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.195.
2
The inappropriate use of HbA1c testing to monitor glycemia: is there evidence in laboratory data?使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测来监测血糖是否不当:实验室数据中有证据支持吗?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):21-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00641.x.
3
The clinical usefulness of glucated haemoglobin in diabetes care evaluated by use of a medical technology assessment strategy.通过使用医疗技术评估策略评估糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病护理中的临床实用性。
Dan Med Bull. 1997 Jun;44(3):303-15.
4
Glycated haemoglobin; past, present, and future are we ready for the change.糖化血红蛋白:过去、现在与未来,我们准备好迎接变革了吗。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;61(4):383-8.
5
Evaluation of random plasma glucose for assessment of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.评估随机血糖用于2型糖尿病血糖控制的评估
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Sep;67(9):1353-1356.
6
The frequency of testing for glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, is linked to the probability of achieving target levels in patients with suboptimally controlled diabetes mellitus.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的检测频率与控制不佳的糖尿病患者达到目标水平的可能性相关。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(2):296-304. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0503.
7
Glycated haemoglobin values: problems in assessing blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus.糖化血红蛋白值:评估糖尿病患者血糖控制情况的问题。
BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):983-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.983.
8
Fructosamine and glycated haemoglobin in the assessment of long term glycaemic control in diabetes.果糖胺和糖化血红蛋白在评估糖尿病长期血糖控制中的应用
Arch Dis Child. 1994 Nov;71(5):443-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.71.5.443.
9
The general use of glycated haemoglobin for the diagnosis of diabetes and other categories of glucose intolerance: still a long way to go.糖化血红蛋白一般用于诊断糖尿病和其他类型的葡萄糖耐量异常:还有很长的路要走。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jul;21(7):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Difference of seasonal variation between glycated albumin and glycated haemoglobin.糖化白蛋白与糖化血红蛋白季节性变化的差异。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2018 Sep;55(5):583-587. doi: 10.1177/0004563218755816. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal trends of hemoglobin A1c testing.糖化血红蛋白检测的时间趋势。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1038-44. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002592. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
Changes in HbA1c level over a 12-week follow-up in patients with type 2 diabetes following a medication change.2型糖尿病患者在药物变更后12周随访期间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092458. eCollection 2014.
3
Variation in the frequency of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing: population studies used to assess compliance with clinical practice guidelines and use of HbA1c to screen for diabetes.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测频率的差异:用于评估临床实践指南依从性及使用HbA1c筛查糖尿病的人群研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 May 1;3(3):411-7. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300302.