Suppr超能文献

通过使用医疗技术评估策略评估糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病护理中的临床实用性。

The clinical usefulness of glucated haemoglobin in diabetes care evaluated by use of a medical technology assessment strategy.

作者信息

Larsen M L

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology M, Odense University Hospital.

出版信息

Dan Med Bull. 1997 Jun;44(3):303-15.

PMID:9233549
Abstract

With the introduction of measurements of glycated haemoglobin in a single blood sample as an index of long-term blood glucose control, the clinically usefulness of these measurements was questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate measurements of glycated haemoglobin as a new test for metabolic regulation in diabetes management by use of a medical technology assessment strategy. Technology assessment in medicine has been defined as "the art and science of evaluating medical practices", but the strategy has to be adjusted to the medical technology in question always including the following three stages: (a) problem definition and identification of medical technology, (b) analysis by testing the technology with consideration to its benefit and harm, its costs, and its social consequences, and (c) synthesis of the accumulated knowledge about the technology. Based on the out-put from the problem definition we found it necessary to investigate some of the identified problems ourselves before implementation of routine measurements of glycated haemoglobin. Several studies were accomplished to validate the laboratory technology in terms of analytical reliability and its clinical usefulness. We wanted to (1) define goals of analytical quality of assays of glycated haemoglobin based on clinical goals, (2) establish a laboratory method for measurements of glycated haemoglobin fulfilling the defined goals, (3) investigate the ability of measurements of glycated haemoglobin to characterize impaired glucose tolerance, (4) evaluate the clinical usefulness of measurements of glycated haemoglobin in the assessment of metabolic regulation in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), (5) compare physicians' assessment of metabolic control in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) with measurements of glycated haemoglobin and determine whether knowledge of glycated haemoglobin values would result in improved metabolic control, and (6) evaluate the organizational and economical consequences of introducing regular measurements of glycated haemoglobin. The analysis required a multi-disciplinary approach. Based on our own studies and the available data information we found that measurements of glycated haemoglobin should be regarded the most clinically appropriate test of long-term glycemia and should be introduced into routine management of adult patients with IDDM and NIDDM with the following guidelines concerning methodologies, clinical utility, organizational consequences. The individual laboratory has to establish and secure its own method since at present we are still without an internationally accepted reference method or reference material. The method should measure HbA1c without measuring the labile intermediate pre-HbA1c and provide separate detection of haemoglobin variants. We investigated the analytical goals for the performance characteristics of assays based on biological variation and on the clinical significance of a certain change in concentrations in the individual. Different strategies lead to different analytical goals of CVA between 2-4%. An oral glucose tolerance test is still required to establish the diagnosis of diabetes. Measurements of glycated haemoglobin have been suggested as an alternative but a considerable overlap between the WHO-defined groups of normal and impaired glucose tolerance was observed. In patients with IDDM our studies demonstrated the limitations of traditional clinical judgement and the laboratory procedures in providing an accurate assessment of blood glucose control and that knowledge of HbA1c values allowed the clinician to identify patients in poor glycemic control and lead to improvement in glycemic control. In patients with NIDDM our study showed that measurements of HbA1c provided information that was otherwise not obtainable in the usual clinical setting in primary health care. Measurements of glycated haemoglobin were easily accepted by patients with diabetes. (ABSTRACT TRUNCA

摘要

随着将单次血样中糖化血红蛋白的测量作为长期血糖控制指标的引入,这些测量的临床实用性受到了质疑。本研究的目的是通过使用医学技术评估策略,评估糖化血红蛋白测量作为糖尿病管理中代谢调节新测试的情况。医学中的技术评估被定义为“评估医疗实践的艺术和科学”,但该策略必须始终根据所讨论的医疗技术进行调整,包括以下三个阶段:(a) 问题定义和医疗技术识别;(b) 通过考虑其益处和危害、成本及其社会后果来测试技术进行分析;(c) 综合关于该技术积累的知识。基于问题定义的结果,我们发现在实施糖化血红蛋白常规测量之前,有必要自行研究一些已识别的问题。完成了几项研究以验证实验室技术在分析可靠性及其临床实用性方面的情况。我们希望 (1) 根据临床目标定义糖化血红蛋白检测的分析质量目标;(2) 建立一种满足定义目标的糖化血红蛋白测量实验室方法;(3) 研究糖化血红蛋白测量表征糖耐量受损的能力;(4) 评估糖化血红蛋白测量在非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病 (NIDDM) 代谢调节评估中的临床实用性;(5) 将医生对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病 (IDDM) 代谢控制的评估与糖化血红蛋白测量进行比较,并确定糖化血红蛋白值的知识是否会导致代谢控制改善;(6) 评估引入糖化血红蛋白定期测量的组织和经济后果。该分析需要多学科方法。基于我们自己的研究和可用的数据信息,我们发现糖化血红蛋白测量应被视为长期血糖的最临床适宜检测方法,并应按照以下关于方法学、临床效用、组织后果的指南引入 IDDM 和 NIDDM 成年患者的常规管理中。由于目前我们仍没有国际认可的参考方法或参考物质,各个实验室必须建立并确保其自己的方法。该方法应在不测量不稳定的中间前糖化血红蛋白的情况下测量糖化血红蛋白,并提供血红蛋白变体的单独检测。我们基于生物学变异和个体中浓度的特定变化的临床意义研究了检测性能特征的分析目标。不同策略导致不同的 2 - 4% 的变异系数分析目标。仍需要口服葡萄糖耐量试验来诊断糖尿病。糖化血红蛋白测量已被建议作为一种替代方法,但观察到世界卫生组织定义的正常和糖耐量受损组之间有相当大的重叠。在 IDDM 患者中,我们的研究证明了传统临床判断和实验室程序在准确评估血糖控制方面的局限性,并且糖化血红蛋白值的知识使临床医生能够识别血糖控制不佳的患者并导致血糖控制改善。在 NIDDM 患者中,我们的研究表明糖化血红蛋白测量提供了在初级卫生保健的常规临床环境中无法获得的信息。糖尿病患者很容易接受糖化血红蛋白测量。(摘要截断)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验