Yanagisawa Nobuyuki, Li Rile, Rowley David, Liu Hao, Kadmon Dov, Miles Brian J, Wheeler Thomas M, Ayala Gustavo E
Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2007 Nov;38(11):1611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
We previously reported that reactive stromal grading in radical prostatectomies is a predictor of recurrence and that reactive stromal grading 0 and 3 are associated with lower biochemical recurrence-free survival rates than reactive stromal grading 1 and 2. We explored the prognostic significance of reactive stromal grading in preoperative needle biopsies. At Baylor College of Medicine, 224 cases of prostatic carcinoma were diagnosed by needle biopsy. Reactive stromal grading was evaluated on hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections on the basis of previously described criteria: grade 0, with 0% to 5% reactive stroma; grade 1, 6% to 15%; grade 2, 16% to 50%; grade 3, 51% to 100%, or at least a 1:1 ratio between glands and stroma. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used. Reactive stromal grading distribution was as follows: reactive stromal grading 0, 1 case (0.5%); reactive stromal grading 1, 149 cases (66.5%); reactive stromal grading 2, 59 cases (26.3%); reactive stromal grading 3, 15 cases (6.7%). Reactive stromal grading in biopsies was correlated with adverse clinicopathologic parameters in the prostatectomy. Patients with reactive stromal grading 1 and 2 had better survival than those with 0 and 3 (P = .0034). Reactive stromal grading was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.953; P = .0174). Reactive stromal grading is independent of Gleason 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 in patients with a Gleason score of 7. Quantitation of reactive stroma and recognition of the stromogenic carcinoma in H&E-stained biopsies is useful to predict biochemical recurrence in prostate carcinoma patients independent of Gleason grade and prostate-specific antigen.
我们之前报道过,根治性前列腺切除术中的反应性间质分级是复发的一个预测指标,且反应性间质分级0和3与生化无复发生存率低于反应性间质分级1和2相关。我们探讨了术前穿刺活检中反应性间质分级的预后意义。在贝勒医学院,通过穿刺活检诊断出224例前列腺癌。根据先前描述的标准,在苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色切片上评估反应性间质分级:0级,反应性间质为0%至5%;1级,6%至15%;2级,16%至50%;3级,51%至100%,或腺体与间质至少为1:1的比例。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险分析。反应性间质分级分布如下:反应性间质分级0,1例(0.5%);反应性间质分级1,149例(66.5%);反应性间质分级2,59例(26.3%);反应性间质分级3,15例(6.7%)。活检中的反应性间质分级与前列腺切除术中不良的临床病理参数相关。反应性间质分级为1和2的患者比分级为0和3的患者生存更好(P = 0.0034)。反应性间质分级是复发的独立预测指标(风险比 = 1.953;P = 0.0174)。在Gleason评分为7的患者中,反应性间质分级独立于Gleason 4 + 3和3 + 4。在H&E染色的活检中对反应性间质进行定量以及识别促间质生成癌,对于预测前列腺癌患者的生化复发是有用的,且独立于Gleason分级和前列腺特异性抗原。