Suppr超能文献

儿科初级保健就诊期间提出的未解决问题。

Unanswered questions prompted during pediatric primary care visits.

作者信息

Norlin Chuck, Sharp Adam L, Firth Sean D

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.

出版信息

Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the frequency, types, and perceived importance of questions prompted during primary care visits for which pediatricians have no ready answer; to characterize pediatricians' responses to them; and to determine how questions prompted while caring for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and children without special needs (Cw/oSN) differ.

METHODS

Patient visits with 35 general pediatricians were observed. Parents completed a CSHCN screener. Physicians provided details about their unanswered questions and their pursuit of answers.

RESULTS

Of 890 observed visits, 170 (19.1%) prompted unanswered questions, of which 60.1% were deemed important or very important. Physicians intended to pursue answers to 49.7% of the questions but actually pursued answers for only 27.5%, citing lack of time and inadequate information resources as barriers. One hundred sixty-seven (18.8%) visits were with CSHCN. Unanswered questions arose more often with CSHCN than with Cw/oSN (28.7% vs 16.9%; odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.97), particularly during well visits (34.6% vs 14.9%; odds ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-6.39). CSHCN prompted more diagnosis and treatment questions than Cw/oSN. Questions prompted by CSHCN were ranked as more important but were no more likely to be pursued than those prompted by Cw/oSN.

CONCLUSIONS

Unanswered questions arise during nearly 20% of pediatric primary care visits. Visits with CSHCN, particularly well visits, generate more questions than those with Cw/oSN. Answers are pursued for few unanswered questions, both overall and for CSHCN. Potential strategies to overcome barriers to answering questions include scheduling more time or more visits for CSHCN.

摘要

目的

确定在初级保健就诊期间引发的、儿科医生没有现成答案的问题的频率、类型和感知重要性;描述儿科医生对这些问题的应对方式;并确定在照顾有特殊医疗需求的儿童(CSHCN)和无特殊需求的儿童(Cw/oSN)时引发的问题有何不同。

方法

观察了35名普通儿科医生的患者就诊情况。家长完成了一份CSHCN筛查表。医生提供了关于他们未回答问题及其寻求答案情况的详细信息。

结果

在观察的890次就诊中,170次(19.1%)引发了未回答的问题,其中60.1%被认为重要或非常重要。医生打算为49.7%的问题寻求答案,但实际仅为27.5%的问题寻求了答案,称缺乏时间和信息资源不足是障碍。167次(18.8%)就诊涉及CSHCN。CSHCN比Cw/oSN更容易引发未回答的问题(28.7%对16.9%;优势比1.98;95%置信区间,1.32 - 2.97),尤其是在健康检查就诊期间(34.6%对14.9%;优势比3.24;95%置信区间,1.59 - 6.39)。与Cw/oSN相比,CSHCN引发了更多关于诊断和治疗的问题。CSHCN引发的问题被评为更重要,但与Cw/oSN引发的问题相比,寻求答案的可能性并没有更高。

结论

在近20%的儿科初级保健就诊中会出现未回答的问题。与Cw/oSN相比,CSHCN的就诊,尤其是健康检查就诊,会引发更多问题。总体而言,无论是针对所有未回答的问题还是针对CSHCN的问题,寻求答案的情况都很少。克服回答问题障碍的潜在策略包括为CSHCN安排更多时间或更多就诊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验