• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡基层医疗临床医生在诊疗现场的信息寻求行为:一项定性研究。

Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Lee Mauricette Moling, Tang Wern Ee, Smith Helen Elizabeth, Tudor Car Lorainne

机构信息

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2024 Dec;41(4):418-428. doi: 10.1111/hir.12535. Epub 2024 May 28.

DOI:10.1111/hir.12535
PMID:38804103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11649596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians' information-seeking behaviours impact patient care quality. Earlier studies indicated that barriers to accessing information deter clinicians from seeking answers to clinical questions.

OBJECTIVES

To explore primary care clinicians' information-seeking behaviour at point-of-care, focusing on when and how they seek answers to clinical questions.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 clinicians after clinical sessions to investigate their information-seeking habits. Follow-up interviews were conducted after a week for those intending to address unanswered queries.

RESULTS

Two thirds of clinicians encountered questions during care, with nearly three quarters resolving them during the session. Colleagues, guidelines and online platforms were common information sources, with smartphones being used to access Google, WhatsApp or UpToDate®. Facilitators included reliable sources and the drive to confirm knowledge, while barriers included ineffective search methods and high workload. Despite challenges, most clinicians expressed satisfaction with their information-seeking process.

DISCUSSION

The findings underscore the increasing use of smartphones for accessing clinical information among Singaporean primary care clinicians and suggest the need for tailored training programmes and guidelines to optimise information-seeking practices.

CONCLUSION

Insights from this study can inform the development of training programmes and guidelines aimed at improving information-seeking practices among primary care clinicians, potentially enhancing patient care quality.

摘要

背景

临床医生的信息寻求行为会影响患者护理质量。早期研究表明,获取信息的障碍阻碍临床医生寻求临床问题的答案。

目的

探讨基层医疗临床医生在诊疗现场的信息寻求行为,重点关注他们何时以及如何寻求临床问题的答案。

方法

在临床诊疗结束后,对45名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,以调查他们的信息寻求习惯。对于那些打算解决未回答问题的医生,在一周后进行了跟进访谈。

结果

三分之二的临床医生在诊疗过程中遇到问题,近四分之三的问题在诊疗期间得到解决。同事、指南和在线平台是常见的信息来源,智能手机被用于访问谷歌、WhatsApp或UpToDate®。促进因素包括可靠的信息来源和确认知识的动力,而障碍包括无效的搜索方法和高工作量。尽管存在挑战,但大多数临床医生对他们的信息寻求过程表示满意。

讨论

研究结果强调了新加坡基层医疗临床医生越来越多地使用智能手机获取临床信息,并表明需要制定量身定制的培训计划和指南,以优化信息寻求行为。

结论

本研究的见解可为旨在改善基层医疗临床医生信息寻求行为的培训计划和指南的制定提供参考,有可能提高患者护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/02c8618e9ca3/HIR-41-418-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/7410148e5dc6/HIR-41-418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/3238839cd0bc/HIR-41-418-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/02c8618e9ca3/HIR-41-418-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/7410148e5dc6/HIR-41-418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/3238839cd0bc/HIR-41-418-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adfa/11649596/02c8618e9ca3/HIR-41-418-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study.新加坡基层医疗临床医生在诊疗现场的信息寻求行为:一项定性研究。
Health Info Libr J. 2024 Dec;41(4):418-428. doi: 10.1111/hir.12535. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Identifying primary care clinicians' preferences for, barriers to, and facilitators of information-seeking in clinical practice in Singapore: a qualitative study.识别新加坡初级保健临床医生在临床实践中信息检索的偏好、障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 18;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02429-x.
3
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
4
Decoding e-health literacy among Palestinian adolescents: a qualitative study in the West bank.解读巴勒斯坦青少年的电子健康素养:约旦河西岸的一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):1561. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22825-x.
5
Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.谷歌医生与消费者:一项定性研究,探索慢性病患者的导航需求及在线健康信息寻求行为
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
6
The Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviors of People Who Have Experienced Stroke: Qualitative Interview Study.经历过中风的人群的在线健康信息搜索行为:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 18;8:e54827. doi: 10.2196/54827.
7
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review.医生的临床信息检索行为:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
8
Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over.50岁及以上患者对在线健康信息及与医生沟通的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 13;17(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3588.
9
Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.临床信息检索的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065.
10
Living with unsettled baby behaviours: Qualitative interview study exploring parental perceptions and experiences of help-seeking.与未解决的婴儿行为共存:探索父母寻求帮助的看法和经验的定性访谈研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Oct;80(10):4214-4229. doi: 10.1111/jan.16070. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital technologies in primary care: Implications for patient care and future research.数字技术在初级保健中的应用:对患者护理和未来研究的影响。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):203-208. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2052041.
2
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
3
Digital health needs for implementing high-quality primary care: recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
数字健康在实施高质量初级保健中的需求:美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2738-2742. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab190.
4
Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies.人口研究:便利抽样策略。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Aug;36(4):373-374. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649.
5
The Online Health Information Needs of Family Physicians: Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.家庭医生的在线健康信息需求:定性和定量研究的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 30;22(12):e18816. doi: 10.2196/18816.
6
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review.医生的临床信息检索行为:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
Impact of Clinicians' Use of Electronic Knowledge Resources on Clinical and Learning Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临床医生使用电子知识资源对临床及学习成果的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 25;21(7):e13315. doi: 10.2196/13315.
8
Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.临床信息检索的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065.
9
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Unanswered clinical questions: a survey of specialists and primary care providers.未解决的临床问题:一项针对专科医生和初级保健提供者的调查。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):4-11. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.101.