Soklaridis Sophie, Oandasan Ivy, Kimpton Shandra
Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, ON.
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jul;53(7):1198-9.
To learn what educators across the health professions involved in primary health care think about the use and development of academic family health teams to provide, teach, and model interprofessional collaboration and about the introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) within structured academic primary care.
Qualitative study using focus groups.
Higher education institutions across Ontario.
Purposeful sample of 36 participants from nursing, pharmacy, speech language pathology, occupational and physical therapy, social work, and family medicine.
Participants were invited to join focus groups of 6 to 8 health professionals. Themes were derived from qualitative analysis of data gathered using a grounded-theory approach.
Three major themes were identified: the lack of consensus on opportunities for future academic family health teams to teach IPE, the lack of formalized teaching of interprofessional collaboration and the fact that what little has been developed is primarily for family physicians and hardly at all for other health professionals, and the confusion around the definition of IPE across health professions.
The future role of family health teams in academic primary care settings as a place for learners to see teamwork in action and to learn collaboration needs to be examined. Unless academic settings are developed to provide the necessary training for primary health care professionals to work in teams, a new generation of health care professionals will continue to work in status quo environments, and reform initiatives are unlikely to become sustainable over time.
了解参与初级卫生保健的各卫生专业教育工作者对于学术性家庭健康团队在提供、教授和示范跨专业协作方面的使用与发展,以及在结构化学术初级保健中引入跨专业教育(IPE)的看法。
采用焦点小组的定性研究。
安大略省的高等教育机构。
从护理、药学、言语语言病理学、职业和物理治疗学、社会工作以及家庭医学领域有目的地抽取36名参与者作为样本。
邀请参与者加入由6至8名卫生专业人员组成的焦点小组。通过基于扎根理论的方法对收集到的数据进行定性分析得出主题。
确定了三个主要主题:对于未来学术性家庭健康团队开展跨专业教育的机会缺乏共识;跨专业协作缺乏正规教学,且已开展的少量教学主要针对家庭医生,几乎没有针对其他卫生专业人员;各卫生专业对跨专业教育的定义存在混淆。
需要审视家庭健康团队在学术初级保健环境中作为学习者观察团队协作实际运作及学习协作场所的未来作用。除非开发学术环境以为初级卫生保健专业人员提供团队合作所需培训,否则新一代卫生保健专业人员将继续在现状环境中工作,随着时间推移,改革举措不太可能持续下去。