Johnson Lauren, Kim Hyung Kook, Tanabe Masaki, Gorcsan John, Schwartzman David, Shroff Sanjeev G, Pinsky Michael R
Cardiovascular Systems Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Nov;293(5):H3046-55. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00728.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
The goal of the present study was to assess the effects of left ventricular (LV) pacing sites (apex vs. free wall) on radial synchrony and global LV performance in a canine model of contraction dyssynchrony. Ultrasound tissue Doppler imaging and hemodynamic (LV pressure-volume) data were collected in seven anesthetized, opened-chest dogs. Right atrial (RA) pacing served as the control, and contraction dyssynchrony was created by simultaneous RA and right ventricular (RV) pacing to induce a left bundle-branch block-like contraction pattern. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was implemented by adding simultaneous LV pacing to the RV pacing mode at either the LV apex (CRTa) or free wall (CRTf). A new index of synchrony was developed via pair-wise cross-correlation analysis of tissue Doppler radial strain from six midmyocardial cross-sectional regions, with a value of 15 indicating perfect synchrony. Compared with RA pacing, RV pacing significantly decreased radial synchrony (11.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.2, P < 0.01) and global LV performance (cardiac output: 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.1 l/min and stroke work: 137 +/- 22 vs. 60 +/- 14 mJ, P < 0.05). Although both CRTa and CRTf significantly improved radial synchrony, only CRTa markedly improved global function (cardiac output: 2.1 +/- 0.2 l/min and stroke work: 113 +/- 13 mJ, P < 0.01 vs. RV pacing). Furthermore, CRTa decreased LV end-systolic volume compared with RV pacing without any change in LV end-systolic pressure, indicating an augmented global LV contractile state. Thus, LV apical pacing appears to be a superior pacing site in the context of CRT. The dissociation between changes in synchrony and global LV performance with CRTf suggests that regional analysis from a single plane may not be sufficient to adequately characterize contraction synchrony.
本研究的目的是在收缩不同步的犬模型中,评估左心室(LV)起搏部位(心尖与游离壁)对径向同步性和左心室整体功能的影响。在7只麻醉开胸犬中收集超声组织多普勒成像和血流动力学(左心室压力-容积)数据。右心房(RA)起搏作为对照,通过同时进行RA和右心室(RV)起搏来诱发左束支传导阻滞样收缩模式,从而产生收缩不同步。通过在LV心尖(CRTa)或游离壁(CRTf)处将LV同步起搏添加到RV起搏模式来实施心脏再同步治疗(CRT)。通过对六个心肌中层横截面区域的组织多普勒径向应变进行成对互相关分析,开发了一种新的同步指数,值为15表示完美同步。与RA起搏相比,RV起搏显著降低了径向同步性(11.1±0.8对4.8±1.2,P<0.01)和左心室整体功能(心输出量:2.0±0.3对1.4±0.1 l/min,每搏功:137±22对60±14 mJ,P<0.05)。虽然CRTa和CRTf均显著改善了径向同步性,但只有CRTa显著改善了整体功能(心输出量:2.1±0.2 l/min,每搏功:113±13 mJ,与RV起搏相比P<0.01)。此外,与RV起搏相比,CRTa降低了左心室收缩末期容积,而左心室收缩末期压力没有任何变化,表明左心室整体收缩状态增强。因此,在CRT背景下,LV心尖起搏似乎是一个更好的起搏部位。CRTf时同步性变化与左心室整体功能之间的分离表明,从单个平面进行区域分析可能不足以充分表征收缩同步性。