Liu Feng-Yuan, Lin Chien-Yu, Chang Joseph T, Ng Shu-Hang, Chin Shy-Chyi, Wang Hung-Ming, Liao Chun-Ta, Chan Sheng-Chieh, Yen Tzu-Chen
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Nucl Med. 2007 Oct;48(10):1614-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043406. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Conventional work-up (CWU) with chest radiography, abdominal ultrasonography, and skeletal scintigraphy has limited value in M staging of nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Our aim was to evaluate whether (18)F-FDG PET could replace CWU by comparing their diagnostic efficacies.
Patients with histologically proven nonkeratinizing NPC and no prior treatment were prospectively enrolled. All study participants underwent CWU and (18)F-FDG PET for primary M staging. Distant metastasis was considered to be present if there was any reliable evidence identified within 1 y after diagnosis. The comparative diagnostic efficacies of (18)F-FDG PET, CWU, and the combination of (18)F-FDG PET and CWU (PET+CWU) were evaluated using the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves.
Sixty-one (20.3%) of 300 eligible patients were found to have distant metastases. On a patient-based analysis, (18)F-FDG PET was found to be more effective than CWU (P < 0.001), whereas it was equally effective with PET+CWU (P = 0.130). On region-based analyses, (18)F-FDG PET was more effective than skeletal scintigraphy and chest radiography for detecting bone metastases (P < 0.001) and chest metastases (P < 0.001), respectively. (18)F-FDG PET and abdominal ultrasound were equally effective for detecting hepatic metastases (P = 0.127). On region-based analyses, the combination of (18)F-FDG PET and CWU did not yield any noticeable increase in diagnostic efficacy.
(18)F-FDG PET can replace CWU in primary M staging of nonkeratinizing NPC.
传统检查方法(CWU),包括胸部X线摄影、腹部超声检查和骨闪烁显像,在非角化型鼻咽癌(NPC)的M分期中价值有限。我们的目的是通过比较(18)F-FDG PET与传统检查方法的诊断效能,评估(18)F-FDG PET是否可以取代传统检查方法。
前瞻性纳入经组织学证实为非角化型NPC且未接受过治疗的患者。所有研究参与者均接受传统检查方法和(18)F-FDG PET进行原发性M分期。如果在诊断后1年内发现任何可靠证据,则认为存在远处转移。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积评估(18)F-FDG PET、传统检查方法以及(18)F-FDG PET与传统检查方法联合(PET+CWU)的比较诊断效能。
300例符合条件的患者中,61例(20.3%)发现有远处转移。基于患者的分析发现,(18)F-FDG PET比传统检查方法更有效(P<0.001),而与PET+CWU效果相当(P=0.130)。基于区域的分析显示,(18)F-FDG PET在检测骨转移(P<0.001)和胸部转移(P<0.001)方面分别比骨闪烁显像和胸部X线摄影更有效。(18)F-FDG PET和腹部超声在检测肝转移方面效果相当(P=0.127)。基于区域的分析表明,(18)F-FDG PET与传统检查方法联合使用在诊断效能上没有明显提高。
(18)F-FDG PET可在非角化型NPC的原发性M分期中取代传统检查方法。