• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传达医疗干预措施危害与益处的不确定性。

Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions.

作者信息

Politi Mary C, Han Paul K J, Col Nananda F

机构信息

Brown Medical School/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):681-95. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307270. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X07307270
PMID:17873256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in shared medical decision making among patients, physicians, and policy makers. This requires patients to interpret increasing amounts of medical information, much of which is uncertain. Little is known about the optimal approaches to or outcomes of communicating uncertainty about the risks and benefits of treatments.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the literature on various issues related to uncertainty in decision making: conceptualizing uncertainty, identifying its potential sources, assessing uncertainty, potential methods of communicating uncertainty, potential outcomes of communicating uncertainty, and current practices and recommendations by expert groups on communicating uncertainty.

RESULTS

There are multiple sources of uncertainty in most medical decisions. There are conceptual differences in how researchers define uncertainty and its sources, as well as in its measurement. The few studies that have assessed alternate means of communicating uncertainty dealt mostly with presenting uncertainty about probabilities. Both patients' and physicians' interpretation of and responses to uncertainty may depend on their personal characteristics and values and may be affected by the manner in which uncertainty is communicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Research has not yet identified best practices for communicating uncertainty to patients about harms and benefits of treatment. More conceptual, qualitative, and quantitative studies are needed to explore fundamental questions about how people process, interpret, and respond to various types of uncertainty inherent in clinical decisions.

摘要

背景

患者、医生和政策制定者对共同医疗决策的兴趣日益浓厚。这要求患者解读越来越多的医疗信息,其中许多信息具有不确定性。对于传达治疗风险和益处不确定性的最佳方法或结果,人们知之甚少。

方法

作者回顾了关于决策中不确定性相关各种问题的文献:不确定性的概念化、识别其潜在来源、评估不确定性、传达不确定性的潜在方法、传达不确定性的潜在结果,以及专家小组关于传达不确定性的当前实践和建议。

结果

大多数医疗决策中存在多种不确定性来源。研究人员在如何定义不确定性及其来源以及如何衡量不确定性方面存在概念差异。少数评估传达不确定性替代方法的研究主要涉及呈现概率方面的不确定性。患者和医生对不确定性的解读和反应可能取决于他们的个人特征和价值观,并且可能受到传达不确定性方式的影响。

结论

研究尚未确定向患者传达治疗危害和益处不确定性的最佳做法。需要更多的概念性、定性和定量研究来探索关于人们如何处理、解读和应对临床决策中固有各种不确定性的基本问题。

相似文献

1
Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions.传达医疗干预措施危害与益处的不确定性。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):681-95. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307270. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Communication and decision-making about prognosis in heart failure care.心力衰竭护理中关于预后的沟通与决策。
J Card Fail. 2008 Mar;14(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.10.022.
3
Risk communication and shared decision making in the care of patients with osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者护理中的风险沟通和共同决策。
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Oct-Dec;13(4):335-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
4
Shared decision-making in the context of menopausal health: where do we stand?更年期健康背景下的共同决策:我们目前的状况如何?
Maturitas. 2009 Jul 20;63(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.01.013. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
5
Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.相互冲突的规范:加拿大乡村家庭医生对临床实践指南和共同决策的看法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):79-84. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007052.
6
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
7
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
Uncertainty in assessing value of oncology treatments.评估肿瘤治疗价值的不确定性。
Oncologist. 2010;15 Suppl 1:58-64. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S1-58.
9
Dealing with medical uncertainty: a physician's perspective.应对医学不确定性:医生的视角
Minn Med. 2004 Oct;87(10):48-51.
10
Primer: Demystifying risk--understanding and communicating medical risks.入门指南:揭开风险的神秘面纱——理解并传达医疗风险
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Mar;3(3):181-7; quiz 1 p following 187. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0397.

引用本文的文献

1
"I know you didn't want to stay": Emergency Department Conversations about Disposition for People Living with Dementia.“我知道你不想留下来”:急诊科关于痴呆症患者处置的对话
Gerontologist. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf184.
2
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
3
Are you understanding what I am saying? The critical importance of communication competency in epidemiology.
你明白我在说什么吗?沟通能力在流行病学中的至关重要性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 31;13:1533393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1533393. eCollection 2025.
4
Uncertainty of risk estimates from clinical prediction models: rationale, challenges, and approaches.临床预测模型风险估计的不确定性:基本原理、挑战及应对方法。
BMJ. 2025 Feb 13;388:e080749. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080749.
5
Women's preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk - a discrete choice experiment.女性对预测乳腺癌风险检测的偏好——一项离散选择实验
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06119-9.
6
How Inclusive Are Patient Decision Aids for People with Limited Health Literacy? An Analysis of Understandability Criteria and the Communication about Options and Probabilities.针对健康素养有限人群的患者决策辅助工具的包容性如何?对可理解性标准以及关于选项和概率的沟通的分析
Med Decis Making. 2025 Feb;45(2):143-155. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241302288. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
7
Defining, exploring the sources and expressing post-mortem diagnostic uncertainty.定义、探究来源并表达死后诊断的不确定性。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00919-z.
8
'If you've lost your personality, there's no point in changing the valve'-a qualitative study of older adults' attitudes towards treatment of aortic stenosis with comorbid dementia.如果你的个性已经丧失,那么更换瓣膜就没有意义了——一项针对伴有痴呆的老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗态度的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e086674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086674.
9
"What Else Could It Be?" A Scoping Review of Questions for Patients to Ask Throughout the Diagnostic Process.“还能是什么?”贯穿诊断过程中患者可提问问题的范围综述。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Dec 1;20(8):529-534. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001273. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
Essential New Complexity-Based Themes for Patient-Centered Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia and Predementia in Older People: Multimorbidity and Multilevel Phenomenology.老年人痴呆症和痴呆前期以患者为中心的诊断与治疗基于复杂性的重要新主题:共病与多层次现象学。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):4202. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144202.