van den Bekerom Michel P J, Lamme Bas, Sermon An, Mulier Michiel
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A.M.C, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Aug;128(8):815-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0447-z. Epub 2007 Sep 15.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease of the synovial joints and is the most common cause of chronic pain in the elderly. One of the treatment modalities for OA of the hip is viscosupplementation (VS). Today there are several different formulations of viscosupplements produced by different manufactures of different molecular weights. The objective of this review is to asses the efficacy of VS treatment of hip OA osteoarthritis in the current literature.
The following databases were searched: Medline (period 1966 to November 2006), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1988 to November 2006), Cochrane Clinical Trial Register (1988 to November 2006), Database of Abstracts on Reviews and Effectiveness, Current Controlled Trials, National Research Register and Embase (January 1988 to November 2006). The search terms [osteoarthritis, hip (joint), viscosupplementation, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronan, sodium hyaluronate and trade names] were applied to identify all studies relating to the use of VS therapy for OA of the hip joint.
Sixteen articles concerning the efficacy of a total of 509 patients undergoing VS treatment for hip OA were included. Twelve European studies, three Turkish studies and one American study with Levels of Evidence ranging from I to IV evaluated the following products: Hylan G-F 20, Hyalgan, Ostenil, Durolane, Fermatron and Orthovisc. Heterogeneity of included studies did not allow pooled analysis of data.
Despite the relatively low Level of Evidence of the included studies, VS performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance seems an effective treatment and may be an alternative treatment of hip OA. Intra-articular injection of (derivatives of) HA into the hip joint appears to be safe and well tolerated. However, VS cannot be recommended as standard therapy in hip OA for wider populations, and therefore the indications remain a highly individualised matter.
骨关节炎(OA)是一种滑膜关节疾病,是老年人慢性疼痛的最常见原因。髋关节OA的治疗方式之一是关节腔内注射透明质酸(VS)。如今,不同制造商生产了几种不同分子量的透明质酸补充剂制剂。本综述的目的是评估当前文献中VS治疗髋关节OA的疗效。
检索了以下数据库:医学文献数据库(1966年至2006年11月)、Cochrane系统评价数据库(1988年至2006年11月)、Cochrane临床试验注册库(1988年至2006年11月)、综述与疗效摘要数据库、当前对照试验、国家研究注册库和荷兰医学文摘数据库(1988年1月至2006年11月)。使用检索词[骨关节炎、髋关节(关节)、关节腔内注射透明质酸、透明质酸、透明质酸钠、透明质酸钠盐及商品名]来识别所有与VS治疗髋关节OA相关的研究。
纳入了16篇关于509例接受VS治疗髋关节OA疗效的文章。12项欧洲研究、3项土耳其研究和1项美国研究,证据级别从I到IV,评估了以下产品:Hylan G-F 20、Hyalgan、Ostenil、Durolane、Fermatron和Orthovisc。纳入研究的异质性不允许对数据进行汇总分析。
尽管纳入研究的证据级别相对较低,但在荧光透视或超声引导下进行的VS似乎是一种有效的治疗方法,可能是髋关节OA的替代治疗方法。向髋关节内注射HA(或其衍生物)似乎是安全的,耐受性良好。然而,VS不能被推荐为更广泛人群中髋关节OA的标准治疗方法,因此适应证仍然是一个高度个体化的问题。