• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Switch costs when reading aloud words and nonwords: evidence for shifting route emphasis?

作者信息

Kinoshita Sachiko, Lupker Stephen J

机构信息

Macquarie Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):449-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03194087.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194087
PMID:17874586
Abstract

Reynolds and Besner (2005) examined contextual control over the use of lexical and nonlexical routes by requiring participants to alternate between reading pairs of low-frequency exception words and pairs of nonwords. Their main finding was that latencies for both words (e.g., wad) and nonwords (e.g.,flad) were slower when the immediately preceding trial involved the opposite item type rather than the same item type (a switch cost). The authors interpreted this result as evidence that under certain circumstances, readers have the ability to shift emphasis between their lexical and nonlexical routes. The present research shows that these results can be replicated using Reynolds and Besner's items; however, the switch cost for words, but not for nonwords, disappears when more easily named nonwords are used. This result suggests that Reynolds and Besner's results were likely due to something other than shifting route emphasis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Switch costs when reading aloud words and nonwords: evidence for shifting route emphasis?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):449-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03194087.
2
Contextual control over lexical and sublexical routines when reading english aloud.大声朗读英语时对词汇和次词汇程序的情境控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):113-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196355.
3
On the control of visual word recognition: changing routes versus changing deadlines.论视觉单词识别的控制:改变路径与改变期限
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):489-500. doi: 10.3758/bf03195841.
4
Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.大声朗读:关于刺激质量和词频联合效应的决定因素
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 May;43(5):749-756. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000344. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Reading aloud: when the effect of stimulus quality distinguishes between cascaded and thresholded components.
Exp Psychol. 2007;54(3):215-24. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.215.
6
Modulation of regularity and lexicality effects in reading aloud.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1255-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03206316.
7
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.超越单音节:使用连接主义双过程 (CDP++) 模型进行大规模朗读建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
8
Controlling lexical contributions to the reading of pseudohomophones.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):373-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194080.
9
The effect of the position of atypical character-to-sound correspondences on reading kanji words aloud: Evidence for a sublexical serially operating kanji reading process.非典型字符-发音对应位置对朗读汉字的影响:关于亚词汇串行汉字阅读过程的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):498-513. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1434-9.
10
Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.“腓尼基式”阅读风格比“中国式”阅读风格更优越吗?来自四年级学生的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):186-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Framing effects reveal discrete lexical-semantic and sublexical procedures in reading: an fMRI study.框架效应揭示了阅读中离散的词汇语义和次词汇加工过程:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01328. eCollection 2015.
2
Pathway control in visual word processing: converging evidence from recognition memory.视觉单词处理中的通路控制:来自再认记忆的聚合证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):692-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.692.

本文引用的文献

1
How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects.近期经历如何影响词汇判断:对称与非对称频率阻断效应
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):726-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03193591.
2
Contextual control over lexical and sublexical routines when reading english aloud.大声朗读英语时对词汇和次词汇程序的情境控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):113-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196355.
3
Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: a reevaluation.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):405-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.405.
4
DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.DMDX:一款具有毫秒级精度的Windows显示程序。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03195503.
5
Strategic effects in word naming: examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts.单词命名中的策略效应:检验基于路径强调与基于时间标准的解释
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):139-51. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.139.
6
Effects of filler type in naming: change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?
Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1277-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03213409.
7
358,534 nonwords: the ARC Nonword Database.358,534个非单词:ARC非单词数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1339-62. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000099.
8
DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.DRC:视觉单词识别与大声朗读的双路径级联模型。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204.
9
Sequential effects in naming: a time-criterion account.命名中的顺序效应:一种时间标准解释
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):117-38.
10
Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.命名过程中词汇和次词汇通路的启动与注意控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):121-35. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.121.