Suaya Jose A, Shepard Donald S, Chang Moh-Seng, Caram Mariana, Hoyer Stefan, Socheat Duong, Chantha Ngan, Nathan Michael B
Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Sep;12(9):1026-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01889.x.
To assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of annual targeted larviciding campaigns from 2001 to 2005 against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in two urban areas of Cambodia with a population of 2.9 million people.
The intervention under analysis consisted of annual larviciding campaigns targeting medium to large water storage containers in households and other premises. The CE compared the intervention against the hypothetical alternative of no intervention. The CE was calculated as the ratio of disability adjusted life years (DALYs) saved to the net cost of the intervention (in 2005 US dollars) by year. A sensitivity analysis explored the range of study parameters.
The intervention reduced the number of dengue cases and deaths by 53%. It averted an annual average of 2980 dengue hospitalizations, 11,921 dengue ambulatory cases and 23 dengue deaths, resulting in a saving of 997 DALYs per year. The gross cost of the intervention was US $567,800 per year, or US $0.20 per person covered. As the intervention averted considerable medical care, the annual net cost of the intervention was US $312,214 (US $0.11 per person covered) from a public sector perspective and US $37,137 (US $0.01 per person covered) from a societal perspective. The resulting CE ratios were: US $313/DALY gained from the public perspective and US $37/DALY gained from the societal perspective. Even under the most conservative assumption, the intervention remained cost effective from both perspectives.
Annual, targeted larviciding campaigns appear to have been effective and cost-effective medium-term interventions to reduce the epidemiologic and economic burden of dengue in urban areas of Cambodia.
评估2001年至2005年期间,在柬埔寨两个市区针对登革热媒介埃及伊蚊开展的年度目标性杀幼虫活动的成本效益(CE),这两个市区人口达290万。
所分析的干预措施包括针对家庭和其他场所中型至大型储水容器的年度杀幼虫活动。成本效益将该干预措施与不进行干预的假设替代方案进行比较。成本效益按每年挽救的伤残调整生命年(DALY)与干预措施的净成本(以2005年美元计算)之比计算。敏感性分析探讨了研究参数的范围。
该干预措施使登革热病例数和死亡数减少了53%。每年平均避免2980例登革热住院、11921例登革热门诊病例和23例登革热死亡,每年节省997个伤残调整生命年。干预措施的总成本为每年567,800美元,即每人0.20美元。由于该干预措施避免了大量医疗护理,从公共部门角度看,干预措施的年度净成本为312,214美元(每人0.11美元),从社会角度看为37,137美元(每人0.01美元)。由此得出的成本效益比为:从公共角度看为每获得一个伤残调整生命年313美元,从社会角度看为每获得一个伤残调整生命年37美元。即使在最保守的假设下,从两个角度看该干预措施仍具有成本效益。
年度目标性杀幼虫活动似乎是减少柬埔寨市区登革热流行病学和经济负担的有效且具有成本效益的中期干预措施。