• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估感知参与度的新问卷的开发与评估

Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation.

作者信息

Sandström Marianne, Lundin-Olsson Lillemor

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Umeå, and the Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Sävar, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2007 Sep;21(9):833-45. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077278.

DOI:10.1177/0269215507077278
PMID:17875563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a questionnaire for self-rated perceived participation in various life areas and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

DESIGN

Validation and test-retest study including multiple questionnaire-development steps.

SETTING

Neurological rehabilitation centre.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients with progressive neurological diseases on the rehabilitation centre's waiting list were eligible to take part in the study; 85 completed. Twenty-two professionals within neurological rehabilitation also took part.

MAIN MEASURES

Reproducibility, internal consistency, content validity and clinical utility of the Rating of Perceived Participation (ROPP) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The ROPP questionnaire focuses on (1) patient's perceived participation (22 items selected from categories of the participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health), (2) patient's satisfaction with the participation level and the desired support for changing it, and (3) patient's selection of the three domains where improvement is most desired. The reproducibility of the perceived-participation items was moderate to good; (weighted kappa>or=0.70 for all but two items) and for satisfaction, desired support, and selected domains it was good or very good (kappa>0.70 for all but in total three items). Test-retest agreement (intraclass correlation (ICC)(1,1)=0.97) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.90) for the total score were high. The content validity and clinical utility were good.

CONCLUSIONS

The ROPP questionnaire has sufficient psychometric reliability and validity and promises to be a useful questionnaire in neurological rehabilitation. Further research is needed to establish criterion validity and sensitivity to change.

摘要

目的

编制一份用于自评在各个生活领域参与度的问卷,并评估其信度和效度。

设计

包括多个问卷编制步骤的效度验证和重测研究。

地点

神经康复中心。

参与者

康复中心候诊名单上115例连续的进行性神经疾病患者符合参与本研究的条件;85例完成了研究。22名神经康复专业人员也参与其中。

主要测量指标

感知参与度评定(ROPP)问卷的可重复性、内部一致性、内容效度和临床实用性。

结果

ROPP问卷关注(1)患者的感知参与度(从《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》参与领域类别中选取的22个条目),(2)患者对参与水平的满意度以及改变参与水平所需的支持,(3)患者选择的最希望改善的三个领域。感知参与度条目的可重复性为中等至良好(除两项外,所有条目的加权kappa≥0.70),满意度、所需支持和所选领域的可重复性为良好或非常好(除总共三项外,所有条目的kappa>0.70)。总分的重测一致性(组内相关系数(ICC)(1,1)=0.97)和内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.90)较高。内容效度和临床实用性良好。

结论

ROPP问卷具有足够的心理测量学信度和效度,有望成为神经康复中一份有用的问卷。需要进一步研究以确定效标效度和对变化的敏感性。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation.一种用于评估感知参与度的新问卷的开发与评估
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Sep;21(9):833-45. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077278.
2
Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire.《参与和自主影响问卷》的心理测量学特性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Feb;82(2):210-6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18218.
3
Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire.患者对老年护理与康复质量的看法——一份问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
4
Validation of a voice prosthesis questionnaire to assess valved speech and its related issues in patients following total laryngectomy.评估全喉切除术后患者带瓣语音及其相关问题的语音假体问卷的验证。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;31(5):404-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01289.x.
5
Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS.ICIQ阴道症状问卷(ICIQ-VS)的编制与心理测量学评估
BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):700-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00938.x.
6
Functional consequences of haemophilia in adults: the development of the Haemophilia Activities List.成人血友病的功能后果:血友病活动清单的制定。
Haemophilia. 2004 Sep;10(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.01016.x.
7
Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者参与度和自主性影响问卷的拉施心理测量学验证
Eura Medicophys. 2007 Dec;43(4):451-61.
8
Development and validation of the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Questionnaire.膀胱过度活动症满意度(OAB-S)问卷的编制与验证
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(3):179-90. doi: 10.1002/nau.20455.
9
Measuring patients' perceptions on their functional abilities: validation of the Haemophilia Activities List.评估患者对自身功能能力的认知:血友病活动清单的验证
Haemophilia. 2006 Jan;12(1):36-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01186.x.
10
The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity.与儿童健康问卷-CF87相比,脊柱侧弯研究学会-22r患者问卷在青少年脊柱畸形中的信度和同时效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 15;32(16):1778-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180dc9bb2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review.改善残疾人户外出行能力的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 14;20(2):e1407. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1407. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
PROTOCOL: Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among adults with disability.方案:改善残疾成年人户外行动能力的干预措施。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 6;18(4):e1280. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1280. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
An Evaluation of the Overall Utility of Measures of Functioning Suitable for School-Aged Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review.
评估适用于自闭症谱系儿童的功能测量工具的总体效用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114114.
4
An Overview of Social Participation in Older Adults: Concepts and Assessments.老年人社会参与概述:概念与评估
Phys Ther Res. 2021 Jul 13;24(2):85-97. doi: 10.1298/ptr.R0013. eCollection 2021.
5
Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)所考虑的领域对于概念化手部损伤患者的参与度来说足够全面吗?
J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Dec;9(3):139-153. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608693. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Social participation in older adults with joint pain and comorbidity; testing the measurement properties of the Dutch Keele Assessment of Participation.老年人关节痛和合并症的社会参与;荷兰基尔参与评估的测量特性测试。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 23;3(8):e003181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003181.
7
Comparing the content of participation instruments using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类比较参与工具的内容。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Nov 13;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-93.
8
A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury.评估脊髓损伤患者参与度的工具综述。
Spinal Cord. 2009 Jun;47(6):435-46. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.171. Epub 2009 Feb 24.