Wressle Ewa, Eriksson Lennart, Fahlander Amie, Rasmusson Ing-Marie, Tedemalm Ulla, Tängmark Karin
Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences-Occupational Therapy, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
The aim was to develop and test a questionnaire for use in telephone interviews concerning patient evaluation of geriatric care and rehabilitation. Instrument development was performed comprising qualitative interviews, construction of items, content validation, pilot study and data collection for evaluation of care and rehabilitation, clinical utility, reliability and construct validity. Qualitative interviews were performed with 12 elderly participants. The qualitative interviews formed the basis for the construction of 45 items. An expert panel performed a content validation of the questionnaire resulting in a revised version. A pilot study comprised 29 participants recently discharged from geriatric wards and the main data collection comprised 221 participants. Inclusion criteria were being able to perform a telephone interview and willingness to participate. Clinical utility was examined through questions to the interviewers, answered in writing. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79. According to a factor analysis and the evaluation of clinical utility, the underlying dimensions of the final revised questionnaire concern 'Respect and safety', 'Information and participation' and 'Rehabilitation interventions', scored in 18 items. In addition, one global item concerns satisfaction with care, resulting in 19 items in total. The revised questionnaire was named PaPeR, Patient Perspective on care and Rehabilitation. The questionnaire is considered valid, reliable and judged to have good clinical utility. The time consumption for the telephone interview is about 10-20 minutes. The questionnaire is useful in defining areas for potential quality improvement in geriatric wards.
目的是开发并测试一份用于电话访谈的问卷,以了解患者对老年护理和康复的评价。进行了工具开发,包括定性访谈、项目构建、内容验证、预试验以及收集用于评估护理和康复、临床实用性、可靠性和结构效度的数据。对12名老年参与者进行了定性访谈。定性访谈为45个项目的构建奠定了基础。一个专家小组对问卷进行了内容验证,形成了一个修订版。预试验包括29名近期从老年病房出院的参与者,主要数据收集包括221名参与者。纳入标准是能够进行电话访谈并愿意参与。通过向访谈者提问并以书面形式回答来检验临床实用性。克朗巴哈α系数为0.79。根据因素分析和临床实用性评估,最终修订问卷的潜在维度涉及“尊重与安全”“信息与参与”以及“康复干预”,在18个项目中进行评分。此外,一个总体项目涉及对护理的满意度,总共产生19个项目。修订后的问卷名为PaPeR,即患者对护理和康复的看法。该问卷被认为有效、可靠且具有良好的临床实用性。电话访谈的耗时约为10 - 20分钟。该问卷有助于确定老年病房潜在质量改进的领域。