Suppr超能文献

扁桃体切除术的并发症:技术比较

Complications of tonsillectomy: a comparison of techniques.

作者信息

Schmidt Richard, Herzog Amanda, Cook Steven, O'Reilly Robert, Deutsch Ellen, Reilly James

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE 19899, USA.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Sep;133(9):925-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.9.925.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative complications of intracapsular tonsillectomy using a microdebrider with traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric referral center.

PATIENTS

The medical records of 2944 patients undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy at our institution between January 1, 2002, and May 31, 2005, were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of delayed postoperative hemorrhage, return to the hospital or emergency department for pain or dehydration, and the need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

There were 1731 patients in the intracapsular tonsillectomy group and 1212 in the traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy group. The incidence of delayed hemorrhage was 1.1% in the intracapsular tonsillectomy group and 3.4% in the traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy group (P < .001). For delayed hemorrhage requiring treatment in the operating room for control, the incidence was 0.5% in the intracapsular tonsillectomy group and 2.1% in the traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy group (P < .001). Treatment in the emergency department or hospital for pain or dehydration was necessary in 3.0% of the intracapsular tonsillectomy group and in 5.4% of the traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy group (P = .002). Eleven patients (0.64%) in the intracapsular tonsillectomy group required revision tonsillectomy.

CONCLUSION

Intracapsular tonsillectomy has a lower incidence of postoperative hemorrhage and pain leading to hospital-based evaluation compared with traditional electrodissection tonsillectomy.

摘要

目的

比较使用微型切割器行囊内扁桃体切除术与传统电切扁桃体切除术的术后并发症。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

地点

三级医疗儿科转诊中心。

患者

回顾了2002年1月1日至2005年5月31日期间在本机构接受扁桃体切除术(无论是否同时行腺样体切除术)的2944例患者的病历。

主要观察指标

术后延迟出血的发生率、因疼痛或脱水返回医院或急诊科的情况以及再次手术的必要性。

结果

囊内扁桃体切除术组有1731例患者,传统电切扁桃体切除术组有1212例患者。囊内扁桃体切除术组延迟出血的发生率为1.1%,传统电切扁桃体切除术组为3.4%(P <.001)。对于需要在手术室进行治疗以控制出血的延迟出血,囊内扁桃体切除术组的发生率为0.5%,传统电切扁桃体切除术组为2.1%(P <.001)。囊内扁桃体切除术组3.0%的患者因疼痛或脱水需要在急诊科或医院接受治疗,传统电切扁桃体切除术组为5.4%(P =.002)。囊内扁桃体切除术组有11例患者(0.64%)需要再次行扁桃体切除术。

结论

与传统电切扁桃体切除术相比,囊内扁桃体切除术术后出血和因疼痛导致需住院评估的发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验