• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代枕颈固定技术使用和不使用C1侧块螺钉的比较。

Comparison of contemporary occipitocervical instrumentation techniques with and without C1 lateral mass screws.

作者信息

Wolfla Christopher E, Salerno Simon A, Yoganandan Narayan, Pintar Frank A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3 Suppl):87-93; discussion 93. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289720.04836.fd.

DOI:10.1227/01.neu.0000289720.04836.fd
PMID:17876237
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to test the kinematic properties of three occiput-C2 instrumentation constructs with and without supplemental rigid C1 fixation. The results are compared with intact specimens and with constructs incorporating contemporary cabling techniques.

METHODS

Five unembalmed human cadaver specimens underwent range of motion (ROM) testing in the intact condition, followed by destabilization with odontoid osteotomy. Destabilized specimens then underwent ROM testing with each of seven occipitocervical instrumentation constructs, all incorporating occipital screws: C1 and C2 sublaminar cables with cable connectors, C2 pars screws +/- C1 lateral mass screws, C2 lamina screws +/- C1 lateral mass screws, and C1-C2 transarticular screws +/- C1 lateral mass screws.

RESULTS

All seven constructs demonstrated significantly lower ROM in all loading modes than intact specimens (P < 0.05). With a single exception, the addition of C1 lateral mass screws to the screw-based constructs produced no significant change in ROM in any of the loading modes. Compared with intact specimens, constructs anchored by C1-C2 transarticular screws demonstrated the greatest decrease in ROM, and those anchored by sublaminar cables demonstrated the least decrease in ROM.

CONCLUSION

Any of the tested screw-based constructs are likely to provide adequate support for the patient with an unstable craniocervical junction. Therefore, the choice of construct should be based on anatomic considerations. The routine incorporation of C1 lateral mass screws into occipitocervical instrumentation constructs does not seem necessary.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试三种枕骨 - C2固定器械结构在有和没有补充性C1刚性固定情况下的运动学特性。将结果与完整标本以及采用当代缆线技术的结构进行比较。

方法

五具未防腐处理的人体尸体标本在完整状态下进行活动范围(ROM)测试,随后通过齿突截骨使其失稳。失稳后的标本接着使用七种枕颈固定器械结构中的每一种进行ROM测试,所有结构均包含枕骨螺钉:带缆线连接器的C1和C2椎板下缆线、C2椎弓根螺钉+/- C1侧块螺钉、C2椎板螺钉+/- C1侧块螺钉以及C1 - C2经关节螺钉+/- C1侧块螺钉。

结果

所有七种结构在所有加载模式下的ROM均显著低于完整标本(P < 0.05)。除一个例外情况外,在基于螺钉的结构中添加C1侧块螺钉在任何加载模式下ROM均无显著变化。与完整标本相比,由C1 - C2经关节螺钉固定的结构ROM下降最大,而由椎板下缆线固定的结构ROM下降最小。

结论

任何一种经测试的基于螺钉的结构都可能为不稳定的颅颈交界患者提供足够的支撑。因此,结构的选择应基于解剖学考虑。常规将C1侧块螺钉纳入枕颈固定器械结构似乎没有必要。

相似文献

1
Comparison of contemporary occipitocervical instrumentation techniques with and without C1 lateral mass screws.当代枕颈固定技术使用和不使用C1侧块螺钉的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3 Suppl):87-93; discussion 93. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289720.04836.fd.
2
Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.颅颈固定术:枕骨髁螺钉技术的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):931-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c16f9a.
3
C1 lateral mass fixation: a comparison of constructs.C1 侧块固定:不同结构的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3 Suppl):153-60. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365804.75511.E2.
4
Augmentation of occipitocervical contoured rod fixation with C1-C2 transarticular screws.采用C1-C2经关节螺钉增强枕颈轮廓塑形棒固定术。
Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
5
Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.寰枢椎后路固定技术的生物力学比较:经寰枢关节螺钉和直接枕骨髁螺钉。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):E696-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182436669.
6
Biomechanical analysis of occipitocervical stability afforded by three fixation techniques.三种固定技术提供的枕颈稳定性的生物力学分析。
Spine J. 2011 Mar;11(3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.021.
7
Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.比较三种 C1-C2 经关节螺钉挽救固定技术的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):378-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bc9cb5.
8
Selection of a rigid internal fixation construct for stabilization at the craniovertebral junction in pediatric patients.小儿患者颅颈交界区稳定的刚性内固定结构选择。
J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1 Suppl):36-42. doi: 10.3171/PED-07/07/036.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.枕颈胸融合术的生物力学评估:部分或序贯固定的影响
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):821-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.008. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
10
Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.四种C1至C2刚性固定技术的生物力学比较:前路经关节、后路经关节、C1至C2椎弓根以及C1至C2椎板间螺钉。
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197222.05299.31.

引用本文的文献

1
A biomechanical rationale for C1-ring osteosynthesis as treatment for displaced Jefferson burst fractures with incompetency of the transverse atlantal ligament.C1 环骨合成治疗伴有横韧带功能不全的 Jefferson 爆裂骨折的生物力学原理。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Aug;19(8):1288-98. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1380-3. Epub 2010 Apr 13.