• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与人工颈椎间盘的运动学:一项初步研究。

The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study.

作者信息

Rabin Doron, Pickett Gwynedd E, Bisnaire Lynn, Duggal Neil

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3 Suppl):100-4; discussion 104-5. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289722.12459.9e.

DOI:10.1227/01.neu.0000289722.12459.9e
PMID:17876239
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical spondylosis may contribute to further degenerative changes at adjacent levels secondary to abnormal spinal motion. Insertion of a Bryan Cervical Disc (AD) (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) may prevent this accelerated degeneration. This retrospective study compares the in vivo x-ray cervical spine kinematics in patients with ACDF and AD.

METHODS

Ten patients with single-level AD were matched to 10 patients with single-level ACDF based on age and sex. Lateral neutral, flexion and extension cervical x-rays were obtained preoperatively and at regular intervals up to 24 months postoperatively. Kinematic parameters, including range of motion, anteroposterior translation, and disc height, were assessed for all cervical functional spinal units using quantitative motion analysis software. Changes in these parameters were compared between matched patients from both groups using paired Student's t tests.

RESULTS

The range of motion at the operated level was greater in the AD group compared with the ACDF group at early (6.9 versus 0.89 degrees, P < 0.01) and late (8.4 versus 0.53 degrees, P < 0.01) follow-up evaluations. Translation was greater at the operated level in patients with AD at late follow-up (6.8 versus 0.8%, P < 0.03) evaluation. No significant between-group kinematic differences were seen at adjacent levels.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AD and those with ACDF demonstrated similar in vivo adjacent level kinematics within the first 24 months after anterior cervical decompression.

摘要

目的

采用颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗颈椎病可能会因脊柱运动异常而导致相邻节段进一步发生退变改变。植入Bryan人工颈椎间盘(AD)(美敦力索法玛·丹纳克公司,田纳西州孟菲斯)可能会预防这种加速退变。本回顾性研究比较了接受ACDF和AD治疗患者的颈椎体内X线运动学情况。

方法

根据年龄和性别,将10例单节段AD患者与10例单节段ACDF患者进行匹配。术前及术后定期(最长至术后24个月)拍摄颈椎中立位、前屈和后伸位的侧位X线片。使用定量运动分析软件评估所有颈椎功能脊柱单元的运动学参数,包括活动度、前后移位和椎间盘高度。采用配对t检验比较两组匹配患者这些参数的变化。

结果

在早期(6.9°对0.89°,P<0.01)和晚期(8.4°对0.53°,P<0.01)随访评估中,AD组手术节段的活动度均大于ACDF组。在晚期随访评估中,AD患者手术节段的移位更大(6.8%对0.8%,P<0.03)。相邻节段未观察到显著的组间运动学差异。

结论

在前路颈椎减压术后的前24个月内,AD患者和ACDF患者的体内相邻节段运动学情况相似。

相似文献

1
The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与人工颈椎间盘的运动学:一项初步研究。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3 Suppl):100-4; discussion 104-5. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289722.12459.9e.
2
Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术的运动分析:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床试验的结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):393-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318150d121.
3
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.关于ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
4
Anterior decompression and interbody fusion with BAK/C for cervical disc degenerative disorders.采用BAK/C前路减压及椎间融合术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):240-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816d5f7e.
5
Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与 Prodisc-C 颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾病的邻近节段运动:一项随机对照试验分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1;36(15):1171-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5c7d.
6
Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.人工椎间盘与融合术:一项对99例患者进行2年随访的前瞻性随机研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815d0034.
7
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
8
Discectomy versus discectomy with fusion versus discectomy with fusion and instrumentation: a prospective randomized study.单纯椎间盘切除术与椎间盘切除融合术及椎间盘切除融合内固定术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jul;61(1):107-16; discussion 116-7. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000279730.44016.da.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.前路颈椎间盘切除并使用锁定钢板和楔形植骨融合术可有效稳定下颈椎屈曲-牵张Ⅲ期损伤:一项生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):E9-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188386a.
10
Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion with ray titanium cage: a prospective randomized clinical study.前路颈椎间盘切除术伴或不伴Ray钛笼融合术:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 1;33(5):458-64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657dac.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and application of a novel in vivo cervical spine kinematics analysis technique.新型颈椎运动学分析技术的验证及应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 20;11(1):24266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01319-x.
2
[Early effectiveness of cervical disc replacement by using Pretic-I].[使用Pretic-I进行颈椎间盘置换的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 15;31(5):513-518. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201612146.
3
Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc.
有限元模型预测了采用各种几何形状的球窝人工椎间盘进行颈椎间盘置换与融合混合手术的生物力学性能。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Aug;12(8):1399-1409. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1616-3. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
4
Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?椎间盘置换术中的颈椎对线:我们是否应该改变观点?
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 7:810-25. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4258-6. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
5
Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.体内动态屈伸过程中颈椎连续运动学。
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
6
Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine.颈椎全椎间盘置换术后节段间和邻近节段的矢状位排列和运动学。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1648-59. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2180-8. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
7
Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.影响颈椎间盘置换术后脊柱生物力学的参数。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S688-99. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1816-4. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Operated and adjacent segment motions for fusion versus cervical arthroplasty: a pilot study.融合与颈椎置换术后的节段运动:一项初步研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):682-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1646-4.
9
Mid- to long-term outcome of instrumented anterior cervical fusion for subaxial injuries.下颈椎损伤前路器械融合术的中长期疗效
Eur Spine J. 2009 May;18(5):630-53. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0879-3. Epub 2009 Feb 6.