Teerakanchana Thirawuth, Puavilai Wilai, Suriyaprom Kanjana, Tungtrongchitr Rungsunn
Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, Rajavithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007 May;38(3):519-27.
In this study, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by direct measurement and estimation using the Friedewald formula, were compared among 1,016 Thai patients. The study assessed blood samples from out-patients sent to the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, Rajvithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, for measurement of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels, January 2004-December 2005. Patients' ages ranged 8-89 years, 573 (56.4%) were females. Linear regression analysis showed the two methods had highly significant correlation coefficients (p<0.001). Upon comparing the two methods, at TG levels of 151-200 mg/dl, bias was 18.3 mg/dl; and for TG levels of 201-300 mg/dl, bias was lower at 11.4 mg/dl; for TG levels of 301-400 mg/dl, bias increased to 20.9 mg/dl. The direct assay meets currently established analytical performance targets and may be useful for the diagnosis and management of hyperlipidemic patients. The Friedewald formula did not give a homogeneous performance when estimating LDL-C levels in samples with different TG levels.
在本研究中,对1016名泰国患者直接测量的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平与使用弗里德瓦尔德公式估算的水平进行了比较。该研究评估了2004年1月至2005年12月期间送往公共卫生部拉吉维蒂医院临床病理科临床化学实验室的门诊患者的血样,以测量总胆固醇(TC)、LDL-C、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯(TG)水平。患者年龄在8至89岁之间,573名(56.4%)为女性。线性回归分析表明,两种方法具有高度显著的相关系数(p<0.001)。比较这两种方法时,在TG水平为151 - 200mg/dl时,偏差为18.3mg/dl;TG水平为201 - 300mg/dl时,偏差较低,为11.4mg/dl;TG水平为301 - 400mg/dl时,偏差增至20.9mg/dl。直接检测法符合目前既定的分析性能目标,可能有助于高脂血症患者的诊断和管理。在估算不同TG水平样本中的LDL-C水平时,弗里德瓦尔德公式的表现并不一致。