Suppr超能文献

选择层次、RNA病毒中性别进化与生命起源

Levels of selection, evolution of sex in RNA viruses, and the origin of life.

作者信息

Chao L

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 1991 Nov 21;153(2):229-46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80424-2.

Abstract

Multi-component RNA viruses have genomes that are segmented into two or more RNA molecules. A viral particle carries only one RNA molecule. Reproduction of a particle requires complementation by particles carrying other segments of the genome. Complementation is achieved when a group of particles co-infects the same host cell and forms a co-infection group. I have previously proposed the hypothesis that multi-component reproduction evolved in RNA viruses as a form of sex. Multi-component viruses may need sex because, like all RNA viruses, they have very high mutation rates. On the other hand, Nee (1987, J. molec. Biol. 25, 277-281.) has proposed the hypothesis that multi-component genomes evolved because smaller RNA molecules are favored by selection on RNAs within a host cell. Nee (1989, J. theor. Biol. 138, 407-412.) also claimed that selection on RNAs alone can account for the evolution of multi-component viruses. He criticized the viral sex hypothesis because, in his view, co-infection groups are not units of selection and are too transient to be engaged in sex. These two hypotheses were further examined through population genetic models. Three evolutionary agents are assumed to operate in the models. Selection on co-infection groups favors retention of the genome on one large RNA molecule because larger RNAs require less complementation. Selection on RNAs favor segmentation of the viral genome into smaller RNAs, which are replicated and encapsidated more rapidly. Mutation pressure also favors smaller molecules because those molecules are smaller targets for deleterious mutations. Analysis of the models shows that (when parameter values argued to be biologically realistic are used) selection on co-infection groups is necessary for the evolutionary persistence of multi-component viruses. Without selection on co-infections groups to oppose mutation pressure and selection on RNAs, a population of multi-component viruses is displaced by a population of parasitic viral RNAs that are replication and encapsidation specialists. These results support arguments that co-infection groups are units of selection in multi-component viruses. Both mutation pressure and selection on RNAs may be responsible for the evolution of genome segmentation in multi-component viruses because there is good evidence documenting the action of both in RNA viruses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

多组分RNA病毒的基因组被分割成两个或更多个RNA分子。一个病毒粒子仅携带一个RNA分子。一个粒子的繁殖需要携带基因组其他片段的粒子进行互补。当一组粒子共同感染同一个宿主细胞并形成一个共同感染群体时,互补就得以实现。我之前提出过一个假说,即多组分繁殖在RNA病毒中作为一种有性形式进化而来。多组分病毒可能需要有性繁殖,因为和所有RNA病毒一样,它们有非常高的突变率。另一方面,尼(1987年,《分子生物学杂志》第25卷,第277 - 281页)提出了一个假说,即多组分基因组的进化是因为较小的RNA分子在宿主细胞内的RNA选择中更受青睐。尼(1989年,《理论生物学杂志》第138卷,第407 - 412页)还声称,仅对RNA的选择就能解释多组分病毒的进化。他批评了病毒有性假说,因为在他看来,共同感染群体不是选择单位,而且过于短暂,无法进行有性繁殖。通过群体遗传模型对这两个假说进行了进一步研究。假设模型中有三种进化因素在起作用。对共同感染群体的选择有利于将基因组保留在一个大的RNA分子上,因为较大的RNA需要的互补较少。对RNA的选择有利于将病毒基因组分割成较小的RNA,这些RNA复制和包装得更快。突变压力也有利于较小的分子,因为这些分子是有害突变的较小靶点。对模型的分析表明(当使用被认为在生物学上现实的参数值时),对共同感染群体的选择对于多组分病毒的进化持久性是必要的。如果没有对共同感染群体的选择来对抗突变压力和对RNA的选择,多组分病毒群体就会被一群作为复制和包装专家的寄生病毒RNA所取代。这些结果支持了共同感染群体是多组分病毒中选择单位的观点。突变压力和对RNA的选择都可能是多组分病毒基因组分割进化的原因,因为有充分的证据证明两者在RNA病毒中都起作用。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验