Suppr超能文献

1999年巴西贝洛奥里藏特市国家公共卫生系统医院中较高的围产期死亡率:是构成效应还是背景效应?

Higher perinatal mortality in National Public Health System hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 1999: a compositional or contextual effect?

作者信息

Lansky S, Subramanian S V, França E, Kawachi I

机构信息

Belo Horizonte Health Department, Medical School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

BJOG. 2007 Oct;114(10):1240-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01450.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In Brazil, it was previously reported that in hospital perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality rates are higher for hospitals contracted to the National Public Health System (SUS) compared with non-SUS hospitals. We analyse whether this reflects a compositional effect (selection of patients) or a contextual effect.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 1999.

POPULATION

A total of 36,469 births in 24 hospitals.

METHODS

A multilevel analysis was carried out using information gathered at the individual level on maternal education (used as an indicator of socio-economic status), maternal age, type of pregnancy and delivery, birthweight and sex of the fetus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Perinatal death.

RESULTS

Risk factors for perinatal death included male sex (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.01-1.55), birthweight of 1500-2500 g (OR = 7.65; 95% CI 5.74-10.20), birthweight of 500-1500 g (OR = 187.54; 95% CI 141.31-248.39), less than 4 years of maternal education (OR = 2.93; 95% CI 1.68-5.10), as well as birth at private-SUS (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.87-4.54) or philanthropic-SUS hospitals (OR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.12-2.92). After controlling for individual characteristics, there was still a significant variation in perinatal deaths between hospitals categories.

CONCLUSION

Independent of compositional (or individual) characteristics, hospital factors exert an influence on the risk of perinatal death, primarily hospital category related to SUS. Considering the highest proportion of births in SUS hospitals in Brazil, especially private-SUS hospitals, improving hospital quality of care is an urgent priority for reducing the toll of perinatal and infant mortality, as well as inequalities in these outcomes.

摘要

目的

在巴西,此前有报道称,与非巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)医院相比,签约于国家公共卫生系统(SUS)的医院在围产期、新生儿期和婴儿期的死亡率更高。我们分析这是否反映了构成效应(患者选择)或背景效应。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

地点

1999年,巴西贝洛奥里藏特。

研究对象

24家医院共36469例分娩。

方法

采用多水平分析,利用在个体层面收集的有关孕产妇教育程度(用作社会经济地位指标)、孕产妇年龄、妊娠和分娩类型、出生体重及胎儿性别的信息。

主要观察指标

围产期死亡。

结果

围产期死亡的危险因素包括男性(比值比[OR]=1.25;95%置信区间[CI]为1.01 - 1.55)、出生体重1500 - 2500克(OR = 7.65;95% CI为5.74 - 10.20)、出生体重500 - 1500克(OR = 187.54;95% CI为141.31 - 248.39)、孕产妇受教育年限不足4年(OR = 2.93;95% CI为1.68 - 5.10),以及在私立SUS医院(OR = 2.92;95% CI为1.87 - 4.54)或慈善SUS医院出生(OR = 1.81;95% CI为1.12 - 2.92)。在控制个体特征后,不同类别医院之间的围产期死亡仍存在显著差异。

结论

独立于构成(或个体)特征之外,医院因素对围产期死亡风险有影响,主要是与SUS相关的医院类别。鉴于巴西SUS医院尤其是私立SUS医院的分娩比例最高,提高医院护理质量是降低围产期和婴儿死亡率以及这些结局不平等现象的当务之急。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验