Maiers Michele J, Hartvigsen Jan, Schulz Craig, Schulz Karen, Evans Roni L, Bronfort Gert
Northwestern Health Sciences University, Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, 2501 West 84th Street, Bloomington, MN 55431, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Sep 18;8:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-94.
Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are common conditions in old age, leading to impaired functional ability and decreased independence. Manual and exercise therapies are common and effective therapies for the general LBP and NP populations. However, these treatments have not been adequately researched in older LBP and NP sufferers. The primary aim of these studies is to assess the relative clinical effectiveness of 1) manual treatment plus home exercise, 2) supervised rehabilitative exercise plus home exercise, and 3) home exercise alone, in terms of patient-rated pain, for senior LBP and NP patients. Secondary aims are to compare the three treatment approaches in regards to patient-rated disability, general health status, satisfaction, improvement and medication use, as well as objective outcomes of spinal motion, trunk strength and endurance, and functional ability. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility will also be assessed. Finally, using qualitative methods, older LBP and NP patient's perceptions of treatment will be explored and described.
METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the design of two multi-methods clinical studies focusing on elderly patients with non-acute LBP and NP. Each study includes a randomized clinical trial (RCT), a cost-effectiveness study alongside the RCT, and a qualitative study. Four hundred and eighty participants (240 per study), ages 65 and older, will be recruited and randomized to one of three, 12-week treatment programs. Patient-rated outcome measures are collected via self-report questionnaires at baseline and at 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization. Objective outcomes are assessed by examiners masked to treatment assignment at baseline and 12 weeks. Health care cost data is collected through standardized clinician forms, monthly phone interviews, and self-report questionnaires throughout the study. Qualitative interviews using a semi-structured format are conducted at the end of the 12 week treatment period.
To our knowledge, these are the first randomized clinical trials to comprehensively address clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and patients' perceptions of commonly used treatments for elderly LBP and NP sufferers.
腰背痛(LBP)和颈痛(NP)是老年人群中的常见病症,会导致功能能力受损和独立性下降。手法治疗和运动疗法是针对一般腰背痛和颈痛人群常用且有效的治疗方法。然而,这些治疗方法在老年腰背痛和颈痛患者中尚未得到充分研究。这些研究的主要目的是评估1)手法治疗加家庭锻炼、2)监督下的康复锻炼加家庭锻炼、3)单纯家庭锻炼这三种方法在老年腰背痛和颈痛患者中,以患者自评疼痛为指标的相对临床疗效。次要目的是比较这三种治疗方法在患者自评残疾、总体健康状况、满意度、改善情况和药物使用方面的差异,以及脊柱活动度、躯干力量和耐力、功能能力等客观结果。还将评估成本效益和成本效用。最后,采用定性方法,探索并描述老年腰背痛和颈痛患者对治疗的看法。
方法/设计:本文描述了两项针对非急性腰背痛和颈痛老年患者的多方法临床研究的设计。每项研究包括一项随机临床试验(RCT)、一项与RCT并行的成本效益研究以及一项定性研究。将招募480名年龄在65岁及以上的参与者(每项研究240名),并随机分配到三个为期12周的治疗方案之一。在基线以及随机分组后的第4、12、26和52周,通过自我报告问卷收集患者自评结局指标。在基线和第12周时,由对治疗分配不知情的检查人员评估客观结果。在整个研究过程中,通过标准化的临床医生表格、每月电话访谈和自我报告问卷收集医疗保健成本数据。在12周治疗期结束时,采用半结构化形式进行定性访谈。
据我们所知,这些是首批全面探讨老年腰背痛和颈痛患者常用治疗方法的临床疗效、成本效益以及患者看法的随机临床试验。