Raina Rakesh, Loushine Robert J, Weller R Norman, Tay Franklin R, Pashley David H
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia Augusta, Georgia 30912-1129, USA.
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):944-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
This in vitro fluid filtration study compared the apical leakage of root canals that were obturated with Resilon/Epiphany (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, CT) or gutta-percha/AH Plus (GP/AH; DENTSPLY Tulsa, Tulsa, OK) sealer using warm vertical condensation. Fluid flow rate through the filled roots was measured 7 days after the obturations by using a fluid filtration device. Measurements were made before root resection and after 3 to 11 mm of resections. Before any removal of root length, there were no significant differences between the roots filled with Resilon/Epiphany or GP/AH. Analysis of individual root resection results revealed that differences in the fluid flow rate of the two systems occurred only when 9 or 10 mm of the roots were resected with more than half the root length resected when GP/AH Plus leaked more than Resilon/Epiphany. There were no significant differences in the fluid flow rate up to and including 8 mm of root resection. It is concluded Resilon/Epiphany sealed 17-mm root canals as well as gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer and that it does not create a monoblock root filling that does not leak.
这项体外液体过滤研究比较了使用热垂直加压法用Resilon/Epiphany(Resilon Research LLC,麦迪逊,康涅狄格州)或牙胶尖/AH Plus(GP/AH;登士柏图尔莎公司,图尔莎,俄克拉何马州)封闭剂封闭的根管的根尖渗漏情况。在封闭后7天,使用液体过滤装置测量通过充填根管的液体流速。在截根前以及截除3至11毫米根长后进行测量。在任何根长切除之前,用Resilon/Epiphany或GP/AH充填的根管之间没有显著差异。对单个根切除结果的分析表明,只有当切除9或10毫米根长且切除的根长超过一半时,两种系统的液体流速才会出现差异,此时GP/AH Plus的渗漏比Resilon/Epiphany更多。在截根达8毫米及以内时,液体流速没有显著差异。结论是Resilon/Epiphany封闭17毫米的根管效果与牙胶尖和AH Plus封闭剂相同,且它不会形成不渗漏的整体式根管充填。