Northcutt J, Smith D, Ingram K D, Hinton A, Musgrove M
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Processing and Swine Physiology Research Unit, Athens, GA 30604, USA.
Poult Sci. 2007 Oct;86(10):2239-44. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.10.2239.
A study was conducted to investigate the effects of spray washing broiler carcasses with acidified electrolyzed oxidizing water (EO) or sodium hypochlorite (HOCl) solutions for 5, 10, or 15 s. Commercial broiler carcasses were contaminated with 0.1 g of broiler cecal contents inoculated with 10(5) cells of Campylobacter and 10(5) cells of nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella. Numbers of bacteria recovered from unwashed control carcasses were 6.7, 5.9, 6.3, and 3.9 log(10) cfu/mL for total aerobic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and Salmonella, respectively. Washing in either EO (50 mg/L of sodium hypochlorite, pH 2.4, oxidation reduction potential of 1,180 mV) or HOCl (50 mg/L of sodium hypochlorite, pH 8.0) significantly reduced the levels of bacteria recovered from carcasses (P < 0.05). Carcasses washed with EO had slightly lower levels of total aerobic bacteria (0.3 log(10) cfu/mL) and E. coli (0.2 log(10) cfu/mL) than HOCl-treated carcasses; however, populations of Campylobacter and Salmonella were comparable after washing in either solution. Increasing the carcass washing time from 5 to 10 s lowered the levels of total aerobic bacteria (6.1 vs. 5.8 log(10) cfu/mL), E. coli (4.6 vs. 4.1 log(10) cfu/mL), Campylobacter (5.2 vs. 4.2 log(10) cfu/mL), and Salmonella (2.0 vs. 1.2 log(10) cfu/mL), but no further microbiological reductions occurred when washing time was extended from 10 to 15 s. Data from the present study show that washing poultry carcasses with EO is slightly better (total aerobic bacteria and E. coli) or equivalent to (Campylobacter and Salmonella) washing with HOCl. Washing broiler carcasses for a period equivalent to 2 inside-outside bird washers (10 s) provided greater reductions in carcass bacterial populations than periods simulating 1 (5 s) or 3 inside-outside bird washers (15 s).
开展了一项研究,以调查用酸化电解氧化水(EO)或次氯酸钠(HOCl)溶液对肉鸡胴体进行5、10或15秒喷雾清洗的效果。将商业肉鸡胴体用接种了10⁵ 个弯曲杆菌细胞和10⁵ 个耐萘啶酸沙门氏菌细胞的0.1克肉鸡盲肠内容物进行污染。从未清洗的对照胴体中回收的需氧菌总数、大肠杆菌、弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌的数量分别为6.7、5.9、6.3和3.9 log₁₀ cfu/mL。用EO(50 mg/L次氯酸钠,pH 2.4,氧化还原电位1180 mV)或HOCl(50 mg/L次氯酸钠,pH 8.0)清洗均显著降低了从胴体中回收的细菌水平(P < 0.05)。用EO清洗的胴体中需氧菌总数(0.3 log₁₀ cfu/mL)和大肠杆菌(0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL)的水平略低于用HOCl处理的胴体;然而,在两种溶液中清洗后,弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌的数量相当。将胴体清洗时间从5秒增加到10秒降低了需氧菌总数(6.1对5.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL)、大肠杆菌(4.6对4.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL)、弯曲杆菌(5.2对4.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL)和沙门氏菌(2.0对1.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL)的水平,但当清洗时间从10秒延长到15秒时,微生物数量没有进一步减少。本研究的数据表明,用EO清洗家禽胴体(在需氧菌总数和大肠杆菌方面)略优于或(在弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌方面)等同于用HOCl清洗。将肉鸡胴体清洗相当于2次内外式洗禽机清洗的时间(10秒)比模拟1次(5秒)或3次内外式洗禽机清洗的时间(15秒)能更大程度地减少胴体细菌数量。