• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知速度的快速测试:15至95岁年龄组的模式

A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed: patterns of age groups 15 to 95 years.

作者信息

Wiig Elisabeth H, Nielsen Niels Peter, Jacobson James M

机构信息

Knowledge Research Institute, Inc., Arlington, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1067-75. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1067-1075.

DOI:10.2466/pms.104.4.1067-1075
PMID:17879639
Abstract

A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed color, form, and color-form naming were administered to 300 normal participants (ages 15-95 years) to explore the effects of age on perceptual (single-dimension naming) and cognitive speed (dual-dimension naming). Naming time means (sec.) were consistent with previous findings. Correlations between age and naming time were low, but significant. Linear regression with age as a factor indicated time increases of 1 sec. per decade for colors and color-form combination naming and of 6 sec. per decade for form naming. Participants were divided into age cohorts, each covering a decade, and naming times were transformed to normalized z scores. The normalized means were similar for color, form, and color-form naming and increased by about 1 SD between ages 15-25 and 75-85 years. The ranges were similar across cohorts, about 2 SD. The findings concur with age patterns for visual-pattern comparison speed, fluid intelligence, and working memory reported by Salthouse in 2004.

摘要

对300名正常参与者(年龄在15 - 95岁之间)进行了认知速度的快速测试,测试内容包括颜色、形状以及颜色 - 形状命名,以探究年龄对感知(单维度命名)和认知速度(双维度命名)的影响。命名时间均值(秒)与先前的研究结果一致。年龄与命名时间之间的相关性较低,但具有显著性。以年龄为因素的线性回归表明,颜色和颜色 - 形状组合命名每十年时间增加1秒,形状命名每十年增加6秒。参与者被分为年龄组,每个年龄组涵盖十年,命名时间被转换为标准化z分数。颜色、形状和颜色 - 形状命名的标准化均值相似,在15 - 25岁和75 - 85岁之间增加了约1个标准差。各年龄组的范围相似,约为2个标准差。这些发现与索尔特豪斯在2004年报告的视觉模式比较速度、流体智力和工作记忆的年龄模式一致。

相似文献

1
A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed: patterns of age groups 15 to 95 years.认知速度的快速测试:15至95岁年龄组的模式
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1067-75. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1067-1075.
2
An additive model for relations between AQT single- and dual-dimension naming speed.AQT 单项和双项命名速度之间关系的加性模型。
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Apr;112(2):499-508. doi: 10.2466/22.27.PMS.112.2.499-508.
3
Processing speed in the aging process: screening criteria for the Spanish Quick Test of Cognitive Speed.衰老过程中的处理速度:西班牙认知速度快速测试的筛选标准
Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Oct;119(2):417-29. doi: 10.2466/22.PMS.119c22z2. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
Multiple rapid automatic naming measures of cognition: normal performance and effects of aging.多种认知的快速自动命名测量:正常表现及衰老的影响
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Jun;98(3 Pt 1):739-53. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.3.739-753.
5
Parietal lobe activation in rapid, automatized naming by adults.成年人快速自动命名中的顶叶激活。
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Jun;94(3 Pt 2):1230-44. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.3c.1230.
6
A quick test of cognitive speed: preliminary screening criteria for Arabic-speaking adults, ages 40 to 80 years.认知速度快速测试:40 至 80 岁讲阿拉伯语成年人的初步筛选标准。
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Oct;117(2):615-26. doi: 10.2466/03.22.PMS.117x20z3.
7
Validation of the AQT color-form additive model for screening and monitoring pharmacological treatment of ADHD.验证 AQT 颜色-形式添加剂模型在 ADHD 药物治疗的筛选和监测中的应用。
J Atten Disord. 2013 Apr;17(3):187-93. doi: 10.1177/1087054711428075. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
8
Reductions in 'Ross Information Processing Test-Geriatric' information processing and 'A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed' processing speed in Alzheimer's disease: which lead and which follow?阿尔茨海默病中“罗斯信息处理测试-老年版”信息处理能力以及“认知速度快速测试”处理速度的降低:何者为先,何者为后?
Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Mar;31(1):81-4. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f45152.
9
Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.成年期全阶段的颜色-文字斯特鲁普测试表现
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Jun;19(3):405-20. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403869.
10
Clinical utility of color-form naming in Alzheimer's disease: preliminary evidence.
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Dec;99(3 Pt 2):1201-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.3f.1201-1204.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Postoperative Delirium After Cardiac Surgery with A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.应用认知速度快速测试、简易精神状态检查和医院焦虑抑郁量表预测心脏手术后的术后谵妄。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Apr 2;17:359-368. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S350195. eCollection 2022.
2
Associations Between Measures of Auditory Function and Brief Assessments of Cognition.听觉功能测量与认知简要评估之间的关联。
Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):825-837. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00077. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Cognitive test results are associated with mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure: Swedish prospective cohort study.
认知测试结果与心力衰竭患者的死亡率和再住院率相关:瑞典前瞻性队列研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2948-2955. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12909. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Rapid automatized naming (RAN): effects of aging on a predictor of reading skill.快速命名自动化测验(RAN):年龄对阅读技能预测指标的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 Jul;28(4):632-644. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1806987. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
Stroop interference and AQT cognitive speed may play complementary roles in differentiating dementias with frontal and posterior lesions.Stroop干扰和AQT认知速度在鉴别额叶和后部病变所致痴呆方面可能发挥互补作用。
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Apr;51(3):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9743-6. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
6
Cognitive speed as an objective measure of tinnitus.认知速度作为耳鸣的客观测量指标。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Nov;122(11):2533-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23555.
7
Characterizing cognitive aging in humans with links to animal models.通过与动物模型的联系来表征人类认知衰老。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;4:21. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00021. eCollection 2012.
8
A quick test of cognitive speed for comparing processing speed to differentiate adult psychiatric referrals with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders.一种用于比较处理速度以区分患有和未患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的成人精神科转诊患者的认知速度快速测试。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2012;14(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.11m01273. Epub 2012 Mar 29.