Wiig Elisabeth Hemmersam, Nielsen Niels Peter
Communication Disorders, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Wiig), and Department of Psychiatry, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (Dr Nielsen).
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2012;14(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.11m01273. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
This retrospective study used A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT) to compare processing speed and efficiency measures by adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or non-ADHD psychiatric disorders and healthy controls.
Color, form, and color-form combination naming tests were administered to 104 adults, ages 17-55 years, referred for psychiatric evaluation of possible ADHD. Thirty healthy adults were controls. Psychiatric intake procedures identified 64 adults with ADHD (ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria) and 40 with mild psychiatric disorders without ADHD. The study was conducted from 2008 through 2010.
At intake, color, form, and color-form combination naming times (seconds) were longer and overhead [color-form combination - (color + form)] was larger for patients with ADHD than for non-ADHD patients and controls. In the ADHD group, color and form measures were in the normal range. Color-form combination was in the slower-than-normal speed (60-70 seconds) and overhead, a processing-efficiency measure, in the atypical range (> 10 seconds). In the non-ADHD patient and control groups, all AQT measures were in the normal range. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis of log-normal values for color, form, and color-form combination and time for overhead indicated significant (Bonferroni P < .01) mean differences between the ADHD and other groups, but not between the non-ADHD and control groups. When using fail criteria for either color-form combination or overhead, the sensitivity for the ADHD group was 89%.
RESULTS support AQT as a possible complement to psychiatric intake procedures to differentiate adults with ADHD from those with mild psychiatric disorders, and they suggest that a controlled prospective study might be productive.
本回顾性研究使用认知速度快速测试(AQT),比较患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)或非ADHD精神疾病的成年人与健康对照者的处理速度和效率指标。
对104名年龄在17 - 55岁、因可能患有ADHD而接受精神科评估的成年人进行了颜色、形状和颜色 - 形状组合命名测试。30名健康成年人作为对照。精神科入院程序确定了64名符合ADHD(国际疾病分类第10版和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版标准)的成年人以及40名患有轻度非ADHD精神疾病的成年人。该研究于2008年至2010年进行。
入院时,ADHD患者的颜色、形状和颜色 - 形状组合命名时间(秒)更长,且额外值[颜色 - 形状组合 - (颜色 + 形状)]比非ADHD患者和对照者更大。在ADHD组中,颜色和形状指标在正常范围内。颜色 - 形状组合速度低于正常(60 - 70秒),且作为处理效率指标的额外值处于非典型范围(> 10秒)。在非ADHD患者组和对照组中,所有AQT指标均在正常范围内。对颜色、形状和颜色 - 形状组合的对数正态值以及额外值时间进行方差分析并进行事后分析,结果表明ADHD组与其他组之间存在显著(Bonferroni P <.01)的均值差异,但非ADHD组与对照组之间不存在差异。当使用颜色 - 形状组合或额外值的失败标准时,ADHD组的敏感性为89%。
结果支持AQT作为精神科入院程序的一种可能补充,以区分患有ADHD的成年人与患有轻度精神疾病的成年人,并且表明一项对照前瞻性研究可能会有成果。