Tonigan J Scott
Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addictions, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):55s-56s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00494.x.
The statistical search for mechanisms of change involves multiple inferential tests, ones that generally follow a fixed sequence designed to demonstrate mediation. While there are several popular approaches to conducting such tests, e.g., SEM and MRA, the inflated Type I error rate problem associated with conducting these tests has received little, if any, attention. This paper offers 2 solutions to avoid committing Type I errors associated with mediational tests. Most straightforward, investigators may choose to use a Bonferroni adjustment. In contrast, a design-based approach can be used that tests rival explanations for the observed effects. Examples drawn from addiction research are provided.
对变化机制进行统计性探究涉及多项推断性检验,这些检验通常遵循旨在证明中介作用的固定顺序。虽然有几种进行此类检验的常用方法,例如结构方程模型(SEM)和多元回归分析(MRA),但进行这些检验时所关联的第一类错误率膨胀问题即便受到关注,也微乎其微。本文提供了两种解决方案,以避免在中介作用检验中出现第一类错误。最直接的方法是,研究者可选择使用邦费罗尼校正法。相比之下,可采用一种基于设计的方法,即对观察到的效应进行竞争性解释检验。文中给出了来自成瘾研究的实例。